Government Reopens, SNAP Funding Restored Amidst Supreme Court Battle Over Past Benefits
Government reopens, replenishing SNAP funds. A legal dispute over the Trump administration's past benefit cuts during the shutdown awaits a Supreme Court ruling.
SNAP benefits go out to New Yorkers despite Supreme Court ruling
New York Daily News
Trump administration orders states to 'undo' full SNAP payouts
Washington Examiner
Overview
- The U.S. Senate passed legislation to reopen the government and replenish SNAP funds, effectively ending the federal shutdown and restoring benefit allocations.
- The Trump administration previously demanded states reverse full November SNAP benefits, deeming them "unauthorized" despite lower court rulings ordering full disbursement during the shutdown.
- This directive sparked legal challenges and conflicting court rulings, with an appeals court ordering full funding to resume unless the Supreme Court intervenes again.
- The U.S. Supreme Court is now expected to rule on whether the Trump administration must comply with lower-court orders for full SNAP payments, impacting many beneficiaries.
- Despite the government reopening, the Supreme Court's decision will determine the fate of past SNAP payments, as some beneficiaries received full allocations while others did not.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources are neutral, focusing on reporting the complex, evolving legal and political developments surrounding SNAP benefits. They explain the back-and-forth judicial rulings, the Trump administration's directives, and congressional efforts to resolve the government shutdown. The coverage consistently attributes strong opinions to officials and highlights the human impact through statistics and personal accounts, without injecting editorial bias.
"The cascading legal rulings — plus the varying responses of each state to the shutoff — means people who rely on SNAP are in vastly different situations."
ABC News"The cascading legal rulings — plus the varying responses of each state to the shutoff — means people who rely on SNAP are in vastly different situations."
ABC News"The cascading legal rulings — plus the varying responses of each state to the shutoff — means people who rely on SNAP are in vastly different situations."
Associated Press"Continued delays deepen suffering for children, seniors, and working families, and force nonprofits to shoulder an even heavier burden."
ABC News"States are facing uncertainty about providing full monthly benefits for a federal food program serving 42 million Americans."
ABC News"States administering a federal food aid program serving about 42 million Americans faced uncertainty Monday over whether they can — and should — provide full monthly benefits during an ongoing legal battle involving the U.S. government shutdown."
Associated Press"The demand from the U.S. Department of Agriculture came as more than two dozen states warned of “catastrophic operational disruptions” if the Trump administration does not reimburse them for those SNAP benefits they authorized before the Supreme Court's stay."
ABC News"The demand from the U.S. Department of Agriculture came as more than two dozen states warned of “catastrophic operational disruptions” if the Trump administration does not reimburse them for those SNAP benefits they authorized before the Supreme Court's stay."
ABC News"The demand from the U.S. Department of Agriculture came as more than two dozen states warned of “catastrophic operational disruptions” if the Trump administration does not reimburse them for those SNAP benefits they authorized before the Supreme Court’s stay."
Chicago Tribune"There is a chaos, and it is an intentional chaos, that we are seeing from this administration."
Fortune"The USDA guidance on Saturday did not explain to states how they should claw back funding that may have already gone out to SNAP recipients."
NBC News"The delay in payments has led to a surge in demand at food banks and pantries across the country, as well as long lines for free meals or drive-thru giveaways."
CBS News"The Trump administration is ordering US states to stop paying full food aid benefits to low-income American families, saying they are "unauthorized"."
BBC News"The demand from the U.S. Department of Agriculture came as more than two dozen states warned of “catastrophic operational disruptions” if the Trump administration does not reimburse them for those SNAP benefits they authorized before the Supreme Court’s stay."
Associated Press"The Trump administration late Saturday directed states that they must "immediately undo" any actions they have made to provide benefits to low-income families via the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)."
NPR"As the legal fight plays out, SNAP recipients have turned to already strained food pantries and made sacrifices like forgoing medications to stretch tight budgets."
USA TODAYArticles (28)
Center (16)
FAQ
The Trump administration claimed the benefits were "unauthorized" and refused to spend all available SNAP funds, despite legal requirements and lower court orders mandating full disbursement during the shutdown. This decision was challenged in court and attributed to a lack of political will rather than a lack of legal authority or funding.
Multiple lawsuits were filed by state attorneys general, nonprofit coalitions, and in class action cases. Lower courts ruled that the USDA must fully fund SNAP using contingency and reserve funds, but the administration appealed. The Supreme Court is now set to decide whether the administration must comply with these lower-court orders.
The government reopening led to legislation that replenished SNAP funds, ending the federal shutdown and restoring benefit allocations. However, the Supreme Court still needs to rule on whether the administration must comply with past court orders for full SNAP payments during the shutdown period.
The delays and cuts caused administrative chaos for states, heightened fear for millions of vulnerable families, and created uncertainty about food security. Some families received full benefits while others did not, depending on conflicting court rulings and state actions.
Yes, the Supreme Court has previously intervened, and the appeals court ordered full SNAP funding to resume unless the Supreme Court intervened again. The Court is now expected to rule on whether the administration must comply with lower-court orders for full SNAP payments during the shutdown.
History
- 1M
5 articles - 1M
7 articles - 1M
9 articles