Sabrina Carpenter Slams White House Over 'Evil and Disgusting' Use of Her Music in ICE Video
Sabrina Carpenter condemned the White House for using her song in an ICE video without permission, labeling the association 'evil and disgusting' and demanding disassociation from their agenda.
Overview
- Singer Sabrina Carpenter publicly criticized the White House for using her song in an official ICE video without her permission, expressing strong disapproval of the association.
- Carpenter labeled the White House's unauthorized use of her music as 'evil and disgusting,' specifically requesting that her work not be linked to the administration's agenda.
- The White House, through Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson, defended the video's use of the song, stating it depicted ICE officers detaining individuals and deporting dangerous criminals.
- The White House refused to apologize for the video, despite analysis indicating many ICE arrests are of individuals not convicted of crimes, fueling broader debate on immigration enforcement.
- This incident is part of a pattern where multiple artists have criticized the Trump White House for using their music in official communications without obtaining proper authorization.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources cover this story neutrally by reporting the facts of the disputes between artists/publishers and the Trump administration over unauthorized intellectual property use. They present both sides' statements, including condemnations and defenses, and provide important context by detailing previous similar incidents and linking the meme controversy to a larger investigation into Defense Secretary Hegseth's conduct. This approach ensures a comprehensive and balanced factual account.
"The publisher is not alone. Sabrina Carpenter lashed out at the White House on Tuesday for using her song in a video about deporting migrants, saying it was "evil and disgusting.""
BBC News"Carpenter tweeted Tuesday: “this video is evil and disgusting. Do not ever involve me or my music to benefit your inhumane agenda.”"
ABC News"Carpenter expressed her outrage, stating, "this video is evil and disgusting," and demanded that her music not be used to support what she described as an inhumane agenda."
NBC News"Carpenter wrote on X that the video “is evil and disgusting."
Deadline"The publisher of the Franklin children's book series has rebuked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth after he posted a meme of the anthropomorphic turtle firing on drug boats."
NPRArticles (15)
Center (5)
FAQ
Sabrina Carpenter objected because her song 'Juno' was used without her permission and was associated with an ICE deportation video, which she described as promoting an 'inhumane agenda.' She labeled the use of her music as 'evil and disgusting' and demanded her work not be linked to the administration's policies.
The White House, through Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson, defended the use of the song in the video, stating it depicted ICE officers detaining individuals and deporting dangerous criminals. The administration refused to apologize for the video.
Yes, this is part of a pattern where multiple artists have criticized the Trump White House for using their music in official communications without obtaining proper authorization.
The broader debate centers on the ethics of using artists' music without permission to promote government policies, especially when those policies are controversial. Critics argue that it exploits artists' work to legitimize actions that may be seen as inhumane or unjust.
Sabrina Carpenter's statement highlights the importance of artist rights and the ethical responsibility of governments to obtain consent before using creative works for political messaging. It also underscores the ongoing tension between artists and political entities over the use of music in public campaigns.
History
- 15d
10 articles