All editions

Thursday, September 17th

The Pano newsletter, as it was sent that morning.

Daily Pano-rama

A recap of the day's most covered stories
  1. 165articles
  2. 236articles
  3. 326articles
  4. 426articles
  5. 525articles
  6. 621articles
  7. 719articles
  8. 819articles
  9. 919articles
  10. 1014articles

Also today: House Holds Leon Black In Contempt · Charlie Kirk Family Files Claim · Trump Backs Michael Whatley · LA News Helicopter Crashes · Susie Wiles Is Cancer-Free

In depth

The biggest stories, and how each side covered them

Day 73 · u.s.-iran regional conflict →

Fed Raises Rates

The Federal Reserve raised rates for the first time since 2023 despite Trump's calls for cuts. · 65 articles

25% left · 42% center · 34% right

What happened

The Federal Reserve unanimously raised its benchmark federal funds rate by 0.25 percentage points, setting a target range of 3.75% to 4.0%. It was the Fed’s first rate increase since July 2023. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh said inflation remains too high after years above target, while the economy can handle tighter credit. Renewed price pressure from the Iran war and higher energy costs helped drive the decision. President Donald Trump demanded rates of 1% or less, saying higher borrowing costs hurt investment. Warsh said Fed independence works both ways. Treasury yields rose immediately, raising pressure on consumer loans. Fed projections show another hike may come this year.

From the left

The hike was framed as a necessary stand against stubborn inflation despite political pressure. CNN said the Fed’s rate move underscored its concern over prices, while Vox read it as a rebuke showing Trump’s bid to control the central bank had failed. Slate blamed Trump’s Iran war and tariffs for helping force the Fed’s hand, and The Daily Beast cast his response as an angry meltdown over demands for lower rates and dubious economic claims.

From the right

Right-leaning accounts led with inflation and a sturdy economy rather than institutional confrontation. Fox Business emphasized elevated prices tied to higher energy costs. The New York Post highlighted Trump’s case for far lower rates and his continued confidence in Warsh. The Daily Caller focused on costlier household borrowing, while noting savers could benefit modestly.

Read the full story →

Ed Sheeran Tour Drops Macklemore

Macklemore's removal from Ed Sheeran's tour sparked artist exits and refund demands. · 36 articles

53% left · 22% center · 25% right

What happened

Macklemore pledged his full $1 million in net tour earnings to six groups aiding Palestinians after Ed Sheeran’s Loop Tour dropped him as an opener. The cut followed backlash over Macklemore’s pro-Palestinian comments at two New Jersey shows, and Sheeran’s other support acts later quit in solidarity. Macklemore said New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft blocked him from Gillette Stadium and pushed other venues; Sheeran said the promoter acted after venues threatened to pull shows. Kraft said Gillette Stadium would not host hate speech, citing what he called antisemitic rhetoric and imagery. He also said Sheeran asked him to commit $2 million in regional aid. The tour is still expected to continue, but new openers remain unclear.

From the left

Left-leaning accounts framed the dispute as powerful venues punishing pro-Palestinian speech, not routine tour management. Rolling Stone cast the removal as repression, while The Guardian treated Sheeran’s neutrality as a political choice once the backlash grew. CNN emphasized the aid pledge as a shift toward humanitarian pressure, and Vox tied the fight to changing views on Israel.

From the right

Right-leaning accounts framed the dispute around objectionable anti-Israel activism, not a clean free-speech case. The Daily Wire leaned on claims of antisemitism, while Breitbart treated the censorship argument as rumor-driven pressure politics from the left. Daily Caller focused on the tour fallout, casting the walkouts as the force destabilizing Sheeran’s shows.

Read the full story →

Trump Threatens Canada-EU Plan

Trump warned of tariffs as the EU backed associate-member status for Canada. · 26 articles

23% left · 35% center · 42% right

What happened

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen proposed creating a path for Canada to become the European Union’s first associate member, a status not now in EU treaties. The pitch would move Canada and the EU beyond their CETA trade deal into an Alliance for the Future on manufacturing, technology, defense, energy and economic security. Von der Leyen said the plan reflects shared democratic values and is not aimed at anyone. Canada has sought closer European ties as its U.S. trade fight worsens, with about 70% of its exports going south. Prime Minister Mark Carney welcomed the idea. Trump called it laughable and warned of heavy tariffs. The legal path remains undefined.

From the left

Left-leaning outlets told the story as allied democracies closing ranks because Trump’s America has become a riskier partner. The Guardian emphasized Canada’s push to reduce dependence on U.S. trade. It also framed Trump’s response as a punitive threat against Europe for deepening ties with another democracy. The Guardian reached for a Brexit lesson, asking whether Britain had been left outside a model it might have used.

From the right

Right-leaning outlets told the story as a major strategic shift, while stressing risks from Canada’s move away from its usual U.S. orbit. Fox Business highlighted the scale of possible EU-Canada integration across minerals, defense, AI and energy. Townhall cast Carney’s Europe push as a break from Canada’s natural economic and security partner. The Gateway Pundit treated the proposal as EU overreach, while the New York Post emphasized Trump’s warning of heavy tariffs.

Read the full story →

Every side, every morning

A free recap of the day’s biggest stories and how each side covered them.

You're reading the web version of the Pano newsletter sent Thursday, September 17th. Browse all editions