ABC News logo
Joe.My.God. logo
Al Jazeera logo
3 articles
·2d

Elon Musk's $55 Billion Tesla Pay Package Reinstated by Delaware Court

A Delaware court has restored Elon Musk's 2018 Tesla pay package, initially valued at $55 billion, which includes options for 304 million shares, significantly impacting his fortune.

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

  • Elon Musk successfully recovered his 2018 Tesla pay package, initially valued at $55 billion, through a recent Delaware court ruling, reversing a previous decision.
  • The reinstated compensation plan grants Musk options to acquire 304 million Tesla shares at a discounted price upon the company achieving specific performance milestones.
  • Tesla's board had made efforts to satisfy Musk regarding his compensation, which shareholders also approved, potentially reaching $1 trillion if all targets are met.
  • The original $56 billion pay package from 2018 had reportedly grown to an estimated $120 billion by early November before its restoration.
  • Following the court's decision to restore his substantial pay package, Elon Musk's personal fortune has reportedly increased to an estimated $679 billion.
Written by AI using shared reports from
3 articles
.

Report issue

Pano Newsletter

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

Center-leaning sources frame this story by emphasizing Elon Musk's personal triumph and the vindication of his position. They highlight the substantial financial figures and the dramatic nature of the legal battle, portraying the Delaware Supreme Court's decision as correcting judicial overreach. The narrative focuses on Musk's influence and the board's efforts to retain him.

"Elon Musk, already the world’s richest man, scored another huge windfall Friday when the Delaware Supreme Court reversed a decision that deprived him of a $55 billion pay package that Tesla doled out in 2018 as an incentive for its CEO to steer the automaker to new heights."

ABC NewsABC News
·2d
Article

Articles (3)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

The 2018 package vests in 12 tranches only if Tesla hits combined market-cap and operational targets; each tranche corresponds to a market-cap step (raising market cap from roughly $54 billion up to $650 billion) paired with matching operational goals such as revenue and adjusted EBITDA, and Musk must remain CEO (or equivalent roles) at each vesting point for the tranche to vest.[3]

The reinstated plan grants options to acquire 304 million Tesla shares across the 12 tranches; the package was originally described as a $55–56 billion award in 2018 and had been estimated to grow (based on Tesla’s stock appreciation) to roughly $120 billion before restoration, with hypothetical upside much larger if all targets are met.[1][Summary]

The Delaware Court of Chancery reinstated the 2018 award after finding defects in the earlier trial court’s factual or legal conclusions (restoring the board-approved compensation plan), effectively reversing the prior invalidation and recognizing the board’s 2018 grant process and shareholder approval; court filings and coverage note the ruling reinstated the package but the specific opinion details the court’s reasoning in its written decision (see Delaware court opinion for full legal rationale).[Summary]

Analysts reported Musk’s net worth rose (reported estimate about $679 billion following reinstatement) because restoring the award increases his potential share ownership; for shareholders, the award dilutes outstanding shares if exercised and ties large potential dilution to Tesla meeting aggressive performance goals that could increase company value, creating both upside if goals drive growth and concerns about governance and concentrated wealth.[Summary]

Further challenge is possible via appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court or post-judgment motions if legal grounds exist; remedies could include a reversal on appeal, remand for further proceedings, or settlements — but after reinstatement a successful challenge would require showing legal error in the reinstating decision or new facts justifying relief.[Summary]

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

  • This story does not have any previous versions.