What is the nature of the legal battle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni?

The legal battle involves allegations of sexual harassment, retaliation, and emotional distress by Blake Lively against Justin Baldoni, while Baldoni has filed a counter lawsuit accusing Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, of civil extortion and defamation.

What does the protective order granted to Blake Lively entail?

The protective order allows Blake Lively's legal team to designate sensitive material as 'attorneys' eyes only,' ensuring that certain confidential documents are not publicly disclosed. However, the court noted that most evidence will likely become public if the case goes to trial.

How does the protective order impact the ongoing legal proceedings?

The protective order ensures that sensitive information, such as medical records and personal security measures, remains confidential during the discovery process. However, it does not prevent most evidence from potentially becoming public if the case proceeds to trial.

What are the implications of the court's decision for both parties involved?

For Blake Lively, the decision provides some protection against the public release of sensitive information. For Justin Baldoni, while he did not achieve full secrecy, his team remains focused on defending against Lively's accusations by using evidence that will likely become public during the trial.

3 sources·Entertainment

Court Grants Blake Lively Expanded Protective Order in Legal Battle with Justin Baldoni

A federal judge approved an expanded protective order for Blake Lively, limiting public access to sensitive information amid her lawsuit against Justin Baldoni.

67%

33%

The distribution of story sources: left-leaning (blue), center (light gray), and right-leaning (red).

Mostly Reliable

The underlying sources are generally reliable but sometimes include opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.

Balanced

The underlying sources are either a balanced mix of left and right or primarily centrist.

Lively’s attorneys had also cited in their February request to the judge privacy concerns relating to other high-profile third parties involved in the case.
Judge in ‘It Ends With Us’ case grants Blake Lively further protections to limit sensitive information from being made public
CNN·7d
Reliable
This source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.
·
Leans Left
This outlet slightly leans left.
These cases involve both business competitors and allegations of sexual harm.
Blake Lively granted stronger protective order as Justin Baldoni legal war continues
New York Post·7d
Mostly Reliable
This source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.
·
Leans Right
This outlet slightly leans right.
The judge also acknowledged that even if confidential info doesn’t make it into the media, leaks around the entertainment business may still be damaging to several people if it circulates as Hollywood gossip.
Blake Lively's Private Messages Will Stay Private Amid Justin Baldoni Lawsuit -- Mostly
Rolling Stone·7d
Mixed Reliable
This source has a mixed track record—sometimes accurate but also prone to bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting.
·
Left
This outlet favors left-wing views.

Mar 13th, 2025, 9:44 PM ET

Summary

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

In a significant ruling, the court granted Blake Lively a modified protective order to keep sensitive communications and documents confidential during her legal battle with Justin Baldoni. The judge recognized the risks of public disclosure related to medical records, trade secrets, and personal information. The ruling aims to protect both Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, from potential harassment and ensure the discovery process proceeds securely, amidst ongoing accusations of sexual harm and defamation between the parties involved.

Perspectives

Compare opinions on this story from liberal (Left), conservative (Right) or center-leaning news organizations.

No center-leaning sources available for this story.

FAQs

A list of follow-up questions readers often ask about this story.