Boston Herald logo
New York Post logo
TIME Magazine logo
3 articles
·1M

2025's Lilo & Stitch Live-Action Remake Criticized for Missing Original's Heart

The new Lilo & Stitch film fails to capture the emotional depth of the beloved 2002 animated classic, focusing instead on chaotic humor and action.


Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

The live-action remake of Lilo & Stitch, directed by Dean Fleischer Camp, has been criticized for sidelining the titular character and lacking the emotional depth of the original. While the film retains many plot points from the 2002 classic, it prioritizes chaotic humor and action over character development, particularly for Stitch. Critics argue that the film's focus on over-the-top antics detracts from the poignant themes of belonging and family that resonated in the original. The film, set to release on May 23, 2025, has sparked disappointment among fans who cherished the original's heartfelt narrative.

Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Pano Newsletter

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

The article expresses disappointment over the Lilo & Stitch live-action remake's portrayal of Stitch.

It criticizes the film for lacking depth and character development.

The original emotional core of the story is undermined by reducing Stitch to a comedic figure.

Articles (3)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

LeftCenterRight
TIME Magazine
New York Post
Boston Herald
How Disney Did Stitch Dirty
TIME MagazineTIME Magazine·1M·
Leans Left
This outlet slightly leans left.

"…Instead of these vital scenes, we get a brief moment in Lilo’s bedroom where she asks Stitch if he has a family."

Maybe a Live-Action Lilo & Stitch Remake Wasn’t Such a Great Idea
New York PostNew York Post·1M·
Leans Right
This outlet slightly leans right.

"…This remake doesn’t feel like its own movie, but rather a doomed attempt to reengineer a miracle."

FAQ

A list of follow-up questions readers often ask about this story.

No FAQs available for this story.