


Russell Simmons Sues HBO Over Defamation Claims Related to Documentary
Russell Simmons is suing HBO and filmmakers of 'On the Record' for $20 million, alleging defamation and suppression of evidence in the documentary.
Overview
Russell Simmons has filed a $20 million defamation lawsuit against HBO and the filmmakers of 'On the Record,' claiming they ignored evidence supporting his innocence. The documentary, which features allegations of sexual assault against Simmons, premiered at Sundance in 2020 and was later acquired by HBO Max. Simmons' legal team argues that the filmmakers disregarded credible information and witness statements that could have refuted the allegations. The lawsuit raises questions about the documentary's distribution and the legal implications of defamation claims beyond the typical statute of limitations.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
- The article discusses Russell Simmons' $20 million defamation lawsuit against HBO regarding the documentary 'On the Record.'
- It highlights Simmons' claims of suppressed evidence and ongoing controversies surrounding the rape allegations.
- Financial disputes with women who settled with Simmons are also mentioned, adding complexity to the case.
Articles (3)
Center (1)
FAQ
Russell Simmons is suing HBO and the filmmakers for allegedly disregarding evidence, including witness statements and polygraph results, that Simmons claims could have refuted the sexual assault allegations against him.
The lawsuit centers around the documentary 'On the Record,' which features allegations of sexual assault against Russell Simmons and premiered at Sundance in 2020 before being acquired by HBO Max.
Oprah Winfrey was initially an executive producer of 'On the Record' but withdrew from the project after noting inconsistencies in the allegations. Despite this, she has since stated that she unequivocally believes Simmons' accusers.
Russell Simmons is alleging defamation, emotional distress, and invasion of privacy, seeking at least $20 million in damages.
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.