New Developments at World Health Assembly: U.S. Calls for WHO Withdrawal Amid Global Treaty Adoption
At the World Health Assembly, U.S. Health Secretary Kennedy urged a break from WHO, coinciding with the adoption of a global pandemic treaty by 124 countries.
World Health Organization members reach global pandemic agreement
Washington Examiner
Overview
During the 78th World Health Assembly, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. called for a global withdrawal from the WHO, criticizing it for political interference and bureaucratic issues. His remarks came as the WHO adopted a historic pandemic preparedness treaty backed by 124 countries, aimed at improving equitable vaccine access. Kennedy urged a shift in U.S. health priorities towards chronic diseases and lifestyle changes, denouncing the agency for its perceived influence from pharmaceutical interests. Meanwhile, the U.S. remains detached from WHO, as concerns about the treaty's effectiveness linger without American participation.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.
Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
Left
There are not enough sources from this perspective to provide an analysis.
Center
There are not enough sources from this perspective to provide an analysis.
Right
The recent WHO agreement, while generally heralded as a victory for public health, faces skepticism regarding its operational effectiveness due to the noticeable absence of the United States, which traditionally plays a key role in global health initiatives.
Concerns about the fairness of the agreement arise from past grievances related to the WHO's handling of previous health crises, undermining trust among skeptics.
The nature of such international treaties often leads to issues with compliance, as there are no penalties for countries that choose to ignore the provisions laid out in the agreement.
Left
There are not enough sources from this perspective to provide an analysis.
Center
There are not enough sources from this perspective to provide an analysis.
Right
The recent WHO agreement, while generally heralded as a victory for public health, faces skepticism regarding its operational effectiveness due to the noticeable absence of the United States, which traditionally plays a key role in global health initiatives.
Concerns about the fairness of the agreement arise from past grievances related to the WHO's handling of previous health crises, undermining trust among skeptics.
The nature of such international treaties often leads to issues with compliance, as there are no penalties for countries that choose to ignore the provisions laid out in the agreement.
Articles (9)
The Guardian·1M·No highlight available for this article.
NBC News·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Washington Examiner·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Newsmax·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Newsmax·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Newsmax·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Newsmax·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Newsmax·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Epoch Times·1M·No highlight available for this article.
FAQ
History
- 1M5 articles