


Caster Semenya Wins Partial Victory in Legal Battle Over Testosterone Rules
Caster Semenya, barred from competition due to high testosterone, gains a new hearing after the European Court of Human Rights rules her rights were violated.
Overview
- Caster Semenya, an Olympic champion, has been barred from competing due to high testosterone levels, deemed unfair by World Athletics.
- The European Court of Human Rights has ordered a new hearing for Semenya, citing violations of her rights by Switzerland's Supreme Court.
- Semenya's partial victory emphasizes the need for better protection of athletes' rights amid ongoing legal battles over sex eligibility rules.
- She was awarded 80,000 euros by Switzerland for expenses related to her case, highlighting the court's acknowledgment of her unfair treatment.
- Despite the ruling, World Athletics' rules remain unchanged, continuing to prevent Semenya from competing in the 800 meters.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
Analysis unavailable for this viewpoint.
Articles (3)
Center (0)
No articles found in the Center category
FAQ
The European Court of Human Rights ruled that Caster Semenya's right to a fair hearing was violated by the Swiss Supreme Court and ordered a new hearing, while also awarding her 80,000 euros for costs and expenses.
Caster Semenya was barred from competing in the 800 meters due to World Athletics' rules limiting testosterone levels for female athletes, which she naturally exceeds due to a medical condition.
No, the European Court of Human Rights ruling did not overturn or change World Athletics' testosterone rules, which continue to prevent Semenya from competing in her event.
The court found that the Swiss Federal Court had not conducted a rigorous judicial review required for Semenya's case, especially because she was forced to pursue her appeal through the mandatory Court of Arbitration for Sport.
Semenya's case will return to the Swiss federal court in Lausanne for a new hearing to address the procedural deficiencies identified by the European Court of Human Rights.
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.