CBS News logo
USA TODAY logo
NBC News logo
4 articles
·25d

Alex Jones Seeks Supreme Court Intervention Over $1.5 Billion Sandy Hook Defamation Judgment

Alex Jones is seeking Supreme Court intervention to block a $1.5 billion defamation judgment for falsely claiming the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax, following multiple lawsuits and bankruptcy filings.

Subscribe to unlock this story

We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!

Get Started

Have an account? Sign in

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

  • Alex Jones is appealing to the Supreme Court to halt or block a significant $1.5 billion defamation judgment against him.
  • The judgment stems from lawsuits filed by families of Sandy Hook victims, whom Jones defamed by falsely claiming the 2012 massacre was a hoax.
  • Jones was ordered to pay substantial damages to the victims' families after facing multiple defamation lawsuits for his baseless claims.
  • He previously filed for bankruptcy protection in an attempt to manage and potentially mitigate the massive financial penalties imposed by the courts.
  • A judge recently rejected The Onion's bid to acquire InfoWars during a bankruptcy auction, citing flaws in the proposed bidding process.
Written by AI using shared reports from
4 articles
.

Report issue

Pano Newsletter

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

Center-leaning sources cover this story neutrally, focusing on factual reporting of legal proceedings and court findings. They clearly attribute claims to Alex Jones or other parties, avoiding loaded language in their editorial voice. The coverage provides necessary context, such as the details of the Sandy Hook tragedy and the satirical nature of The Onion's involvement, without injecting bias into the narrative.

"Jones claimed that absent emergency relief, InfoWars "will have been acquired by its ideological nemesis and destroyed — which Jones believes is the Plaintiffs' intention," and its listeners will be deprived of a "valued source of information.""

CBS NewsCBS News
·25d
Article

"Jones argued in his request to the court that InfoWars will be "destroyed" if the justices don't help him now because it will be acquired by "its ideological nemesis.""

USA TODAYUSA TODAY
·25d
Article

"Jones said the court's immediate involvement is needed because his website, InfoWars, is on the verge of being turned over to the satirical news site The Onion to help fund payments to family members of the Sandy Hook victims."

NBC NewsNBC News
·25d
Article

Articles (4)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

No FAQs available for this story.

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

  • This story does not have any previous versions.