


Federal Court Revives Challenge on Mail-in Ballots in Mississippi
A federal court has reversed a decision, impacting the counting of mail-in ballots in Mississippi, a key issue ahead of the November elections.

Federal judge orders Virginia to restore more than 1,600 voter registrations

Straight Arrow News

Federal Judge Orders Virginia To Reinstate Noncitizens on Voter Rolls

Washington Free Beacon
Overview
A recent ruling by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals prohibits Mississippi from counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day, even if postmarked on that day. The ruling is set to reshape ongoing legal challenges surrounding election laws, as it reverses a previous dismissal of concerns that the state's laws violate federal regulations. While this decision won't affect the upcoming Nov. 5 election, it could have significant implications in swing states. Bipartisan support exists for Mississippi's practice, adding complexity to the legal landscape as both parties prepare for the presidential election.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
- The ruling effectively undermines voting rights and could create chaos in the electoral process by delegitimizing mail-in ballots, a practice widely used in many states.
- Democrats and voting rights advocates are concerned that this ruling could serve as a model for legal challenges to mail-in voting in other states, especially where margins are tight in key races.
- The decision reflects a partisan agenda and raises fears about election integrity, echoing former President Trump's claims about the illegitimacy of late mail-in ballots.
Analysis unavailable for this viewpoint.
- The ruling emphasizes the necessity of ensuring fair, accurate, and secure elections by requiring that ballots be received by Election Day, aligning with federal law.
- Republicans view this as a significant win against what they consider unnecessary expansions of mail-in voting that could lead to fraud and compromised election integrity.
- The decision reinforces the constitutional authority of Congress over election timing, affirming that states cannot extend voting periods beyond what federal law prescribes.
Articles (33)
Center (13)
No highlight available for this article.


No highlight available for this article.


No highlight available for this article.


No highlight available for this article.


No highlight available for this article.

No highlight available for this article.


No highlight available for this article.


No highlight available for this article.


No highlight available for this article.


No highlight available for this article.


No highlight available for this article.


No highlight available for this article.

No highlight available for this article.


History
- 8M2 articles
- 8M4 articles