Analysis unavailable for this viewpoint.

• The military appeals court's ruling to reinstate the plea agreements is a necessary affirmation of military jurisdiction over terrorism cases, reinforcing the legal framework established for dealing with the most notorious terrorists.
• Secretary Austin's unilateral attempt to void the plea deals not only overstepped his authority but also risked undermining years of negotiations that sought a workable resolution to the 9/11 prosecutions.
• Advocates for the plea deals argue that they represent a pragmatic approach to a complicated legal situation, and highlight the importance of allowing military courts to operate independently without political interference.