3 sources·Politics

Pulitzer Prize Board Seeks to Pause Trump's Defamation Lawsuit Using His Own Legal Arguments

The Pulitzer Prize Board has requested a judge to pause Trump's defamation lawsuit, citing his own legal stance on presidential immunity.

The distribution of story sources: left-leaning (blue), center (light gray), and right-leaning (red).
Mostly Reliable
The underlying sources are generally reliable but sometimes include opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.
Leans Left
The underlying sources slightly lean left.
  1. Pulitzer Board uses Trump's own legal argument against him

    The legal arguments put forth by the Pulitzer Prize Board signal a troubling precedent where the judicial process could be hindered by a sitting president's claims of immunity, potentially undermining accountability and the integrity of the legal system.

    Pulitzer Board uses Trump's own legal argument against him

    NewsweekNewsweek·3M
    Mostly Reliable
    This source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.
    ·
    Center
    This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
  2. How Pulitzer is 'flipping Trump’s own arguments on their head' in ongoing legal battle

    The Pulitzer Prize Board's strategic use of Trump's own legal arguments serves as a clever maneuver to defend against the defamation lawsuit, highlighting the complexities and contradictions of his ongoing legal battles.

    How Pulitzer is 'flipping Trump’s own arguments on their head' in ongoing legal battle

    AlterNetAlterNet·3M
    Mixed Reliable
    This source has a mixed track record—sometimes accurate but also prone to bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting.
    ·
    Left
    This outlet favors left-wing views.
  3. Pulitzer Board Flips To Use Trump’s Legal Playbook Against Him in Defamation Case

    The Pulitzer Board's strategic maneuvering to turn Trump’s arguments against him not only showcases their legal acumen but also highlights the absurdity of his claims for immunity from accountability.

    Pulitzer Board Flips To Use Trump’s Legal Playbook Against Him in Defamation Case

    MEDIAiteMEDIAite·3M
    Mostly Reliable
    This source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.
    ·
    Leans Left
    This outlet slightly leans left.
  1. Newsweek
  2. AlterNet
  3. MEDIAite
Updated: Jan 28th, 2025, 11:16 AM ET

Summary

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

The Pulitzer Prize Board has filed a motion to suspend President Trump's defamation lawsuit against them, effectively using arguments he made to delay other lawsuits during his presidency. Trump is seeking to rescind the Pulitzer Awards given to The New York Times and The Washington Post for their reporting on 2016 Russian interference. Trump's claims rely on the assertion that the board acted with malice in awarding the prizes. The motion cites constitutional concerns tied to a sitting president's legal immunity, suggesting proceeding with the lawsuit could create constitutional conflicts.

Perspectives

Compare opinions on this story from liberal (Left), conservative (Right) or center-leaning news organizations.

No center-leaning sources available for this story.

Pulitzer Prize Board Seeks to Pause Trump's Defamation Lawsuit Using His Own Legal Arguments - Pano News