Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Trump's Funding Freeze Amid Backlash and Confusion
The Trump administration's freeze on federal assistance has drawn legal challenges and confusion over its impact, prompting a judge to issue a temporary halt.
Judge blocks Trump's plan to freeze federal grants
Business Insider
GOP Lawmakers Defend Trump’s Grant Freeze
Epoch Times
Trump’s aid freeze frozen
The Hill
Trump ignites Democratic backlash for federal grant ‘blitzkrieg’
Washington Examiner
Trump’s Blatantly Illegal Funding Freeze Causes Nationwide Chaos
New York Magazine
Trump Administration Orders Sweeping Freeze of Federal Aid
Scientific American
White House Pauses Federal Grants, Loans
Epoch Times
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedHave an account? Sign in
Overview
The Trump administration's January 29, 2025, directive to freeze federal grants and loans has triggered significant backlash, resulting in legal challenges from nonprofits and state officials. Amid confusion over which programs were affected, a federal judge issued a temporary stay on the freeze until February 3, allowing essential funds to continue. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt faced intense questioning during her briefing, reassuring that payments for Social Security, Medicare, and other direct benefits would remain unaffected. However, reports of access issues to Medicaid funding and uncertainty surrounding other critical social services persist, highlighting the fragility of these systems.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Analysis unavailable for this viewpoint.
Articles (112)
Center (53)
History
- 8M
4 articles
- 8M
4 articles
- 8M5 articles