Mississippi Judge Orders Deletion of Critical Editorial, Raising First Amendment Concerns
A Mississippi judge's order to remove a newspaper editorial on transparency raises significant First Amendment issues, prompting backlash from press advocates.
The city claims the editorial exhibited actual malice and interfered with their legislative advocacy.
Mississippi judge orders paper to take down criticism of city officials
Straight Arrow News·2M·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.The order drew complaints from press advocates in Mississippi and nationwide.
A Mississippi judge ordered a newspaper to remove an editorial. Press advocates are outraged
Associated Press·2M·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
Summary
A Mississippi judge has ordered the Clarksdale Press Register to take down an editorial that criticized local officials for failing to inform the media about a tax-related meeting. This action, spurred by a city lawsuit claiming defamation, has sparked widespread concern over First Amendment rights. Critics argue this constitutes censorship and undermines press freedom. Judge Crystal Wise Martin, who issued the order without a hearing, justified it by claiming the editorial displayed reckless disregard for the truth. The case echoes historical precedents on press protections, notably the 1931 Supreme Court ruling against prior restraint.
Perspectives
No center-leaning sources available for this story.