How many federal employees are potentially affected by these layoffs?

The initial round of layoffs could impact more than 200,000 workers hired by the federal government within the last two years.

What was the basis for the federal judge's decision to allow the layoffs to proceed?

The judge ruled that the unions' claims must be brought under federal employment law rather than in district court, and that the unions failed to show immediate irreparable harm to justify halting the layoffs.

What are the unions' next steps in challenging these layoffs?

The unions plan to continue challenging the layoffs through the appropriate legal channels, with the president of the National Treasury Employees' Union stating that federal employees will get their day in court.

How have these layoffs affected government services?

Critics highlight that these firings create disruption within government services, as many employees face uncertain futures.

7 sources·Politics

Federal Judge Allows Trump Administration to Proceed with Mass Federal Employee Firings

A federal judge ruled to allow President Trump's mass layoffs of federal employees, dismissing union claims for an emergency injunction.

43%

14%

43%

The distribution of story sources: left-leaning (blue), center (light gray), and right-leaning (red).

Mostly Reliable

The underlying sources are generally reliable but sometimes include opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.

Balanced

The underlying sources are either a balanced mix of left and right or primarily centrist.

The Trump administration had dismissed those expenses as “overhead” but universities and hospitals argue they’re far more critical.
Huge cuts in National Institutes of Health research funding go before a federal judge in Boston
Boston Globe·1M
Reliable
This source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.
·
Leans Left
This outlet slightly leans left.
The ruling comes as thousands of federal government employees have been shown the door during in the first month of Trump’s second administration.
Judge Allows Trump's Mass Firings of Federal Workers
TIME Magazine·1M
Reliable
This source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.
·
Leans Left
This outlet slightly leans left.
Cooper acknowledged that the Republican president’s second term “has been defined by an onslaught of executive actions that have caused, some say by design, disruption and even chaos in widespread quarters of American society.”
Federal judge allows Trump's mass firings of federal workers to move forward
Associated Press·1M
Reliable
This source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.
·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
The rapid-fire adoption of many of Project 2025’s objectives indicates that Trump acolytes — many of its contributors were veterans of his first term, and some have joined his second administration — have for years quietly laid the groundwork to disrupt the national health system.
Trump’s team is using Project 2025 as a blueprint to make changes to federal health programs
CNN·1M
Reliable
This source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.
·
Leans Left
This outlet slightly leans left.
Implementing this 15% cap will mean the abrupt loss of hundreds of millions of dollars that are already committed to employing tens of thousands of researchers and other workers, putting a halt to countless lifesaving health research and cutting-edge technology initiatives.
NIH Research Cuts Go Before a Federal Judge
Newsmax·1M
Mixed Reliable
This source has a mixed track record—sometimes accurate but also prone to bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting.
·
Right
This outlet favors right-wing views.

Updated: Feb 21st, 2025, 12:17 PM ET

Summary

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled that unions could not prevent mass layoffs of federal workers initiated by President Trump, citing jurisdictional issues. The administration argues that unions failed to show concrete immediate harm to justify halting the firings. Hundreds of federal employees have already lost their jobs, with unions adamant that the layoffs violate federal law. Critics highlight the disruption these firings create within government services, as many employees face uncertain futures. This ruling follows various legal challenges to Trump's actions since the beginning of his second term, amid accusations of chaos caused by executive orders.

Perspectives

Compare opinions on this story from liberal (Left), conservative (Right) or center-leaning news organizations.

No center-leaning sources available for this story.

FAQs

A list of follow-up questions readers often ask about this story.