Federal Judge Blocks Trump's DEI Executive Orders, Cites First Amendment Violations
A federal judge temporarily halts Trump's executive orders on DEI programs, asserting they likely infringe on First Amendment rights amid ongoing lawsuits.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedHave an account? Sign in
Overview
U.S. District Judge Adam Abelson has paused enforcement of President Trump's executive orders aimed at eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs across federal agencies. His ruling follows a lawsuit from the city of Baltimore and various higher education groups alleging constitutional violations. Abelson noted that Trump's orders are vague and could suppress free speech, emphasizing the plaintiffs' fears of repercussions. The court's decision halts ongoing efforts to terminate DEI initiatives, including federal contracts and grants, while debates continue regarding the legality and impact of such executive actions on protected speech.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Analysis unavailable for this viewpoint.
Articles (12)
Center (5)
FAQ
Judge Abelson blocked the orders because they likely violate free-speech rights, are vague, and could discourage businesses and organizations from supporting DEI initiatives due to the chilling effect on free speech.
The plaintiffs included the city of Baltimore, the National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education, the American Association of University Professors, and the Restaurant Opportunities Centers United.
Trump's orders directed federal agencies to terminate all 'equity-related' grants or contracts and required federal contractors to certify that they do not promote DEI.
The Trump administration argued that the president was targeting only DEI programs that violate federal civil rights laws.
History
- 7M
6 articles