Supreme Court Considers Case of Alleged Workplace Discrimination Against Straight Employee
Marlean Ames alleges workplace discrimination for being straight, as the Supreme Court shows potential support for her claim against Ohio state officials.
The Supreme Court decision could be a unanimous one, based on the questions asked by justices on both sides of the aisle, with the case likely being sent back to lower courts for further litigation.
The Post Millennial·22d·Mixed ReliableThis source has a mixed track record—sometimes accurate but also prone to bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting.RightThis outlet favors right-wing views.
Ohio court precedent covering some states, including Ohio, requires that members of majority groups - such as white people or heterosexuals - show a higher level of evidence when making discrimination claims.
US Supreme Court hears arguments in 'straight discrimination' case
BBC News·22d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
A ruling that allows the woman, Marlean Ames, to pursue the claim would open the door for men, white people, and heterosexual people to sue for job discrimination in the future.
Supreme Court could lower bar for white workers to sue for racial bias
Axios·22d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
A ruling in the case is expected by summer and could reshape employment discrimination law nationwide.
Supreme Court poised to lower bar for reverse discrimination claims
Washington Examiner·22d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans RightThis outlet slightly leans right.
Still, Jonathan Segal, a labor law expert at Duane Morris, predicted a ruling for Ames will boost the already increasing number of reverse discrimination suits.
Supreme Court appears likely to side with straight woman in `reverse discrimination' case
USA TODAY·22d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
The outcome of the case could remove an additional requirement that some courts apply when members of a majority group, including those who are white and heterosexual, sue for discrimination under federal law.
Supreme Court seems likely to rule for Ohio woman claiming job bias because she’s straight
Boston Herald·22d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans RightThis outlet slightly leans right.
The legal question at the Supreme Court is whether majority-group plaintiffs need to show such circumstances.
Supreme Court to hear arguments in straight woman’s 'reverse' discrimination appeal
MSNBC·22d·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.LeftThis outlet favors left-wing views.The outcome of the case could remove an additional requirement that some courts apply when members of a majority group, including those who are white and heterosexual, sue for discrimination under federal law.
Supreme Court seems likely to rule for Ohio woman claiming job bias because she's straight
Associated Press·22d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
The court's ruling could lower the bar at least in some parts of the country for people belonging to majority groups to bring so-called reverse discrimination claims.
Supreme Court leans toward reviving straight woman's reverse discrimination claim
NBC News·22d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
Stakes in the case are high.
US supreme court to hear straight woman’s ‘reverse discrimination’ case
The Guardian·22d·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.Leans LeftThis outlet slightly leans left.
Summary
The Supreme Court is hearing a case from Marlean Ames, who alleges discrimination at the Ohio Department of Youth Services because she is heterosexual. Despite lower courts ruling against her, justices voiced sympathy for her argument that she was sidelined for promotions in favor of gay colleagues. Ohio state officials deny discrimination, asserting Ames didn't meet the necessary evidence standards. However, the justices appeared united on the idea that discrimination based on sexual orientation doesn't allow for differing standards of proof depending on the individual's group status, potentially impacting future claims of 'reverse discrimination.'
Perspectives
The Supreme Court's ruling in the Ames case could eliminate the special burden of proof for majority group plaintiffs, indicating a potential shift in how workplace discrimination claims are evaluated.
Both conservative and liberal justices appeared to agree that the existing 'background circumstances' standard is inconsistent with federal law and may deter legitimate discrimination claims by majority group members.
The focus of the court's deliberations is on equal treatment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, suggesting that all employees—regardless of sexual orientation—should face the same legal standards when bringing discrimination claims.
FAQs
History
- 22d