NBC News logo
New York Post logo
ABC News logo
5 articles
·4M

Judge Rules Trump’s Attempt to Remove Special Counsel Unlawful

A federal judge ruled that Trump’s removal of Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger was unlawful, ensuring Dellinger remains in position amid ongoing legal battles.

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

A federal judge ruled that President Trump’s termination of Hampton Dellinger, head of the Office of Special Counsel, was unlawful, reinstating him in his position. The ruling highlights the protections afforded to special counsels, only allowing removal under specific conditions. The decision emphasizes the importance of Dellinger’s role in protecting whistleblowers and federal employees from unlawful treatment. The Trump administration plans to appeal the ruling, which could escalate to the Supreme Court. Dellinger, appointed by President Biden, aims to uphold the independence and legal protections of his office amid ongoing governance challenges.

Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Pano Newsletter

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

  • A federal court ruled against President Trump's attempt to remove Hampton Dellinger from the Office of Special Counsel, asserting that such dismissal was unlawful and violated statutory protections.
  • Judge Jackson emphasized the importance of the Special Counsel's independence to protect federal employees from unlawful actions, including retaliation for whistleblowing.
  • The case reflects broader themes of presidential authority and the independence of federal agencies, suggesting tensions between executive power and statutory limits.

Articles (5)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

Center (3)

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

President Trump attempted to remove Hampton Dellinger because he wanted to assert his authority over executive agencies, arguing that the restrictions on removing the Special Counsel are unconstitutional. However, the specific reasons for Dellinger's dismissal were not provided in the termination notice.

A Special Counsel can only be removed for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office, as specified by federal law.

The ruling reinforces the independence of agencies like the Office of Special Counsel, limiting the president's ability to remove agency heads without cause. This could set a precedent for future cases involving executive power over independent agencies.

The Trump administration has appealed Judge Jackson's decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The case may eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

  • This story does not have any previous versions.