Why did President Trump attempt to remove Hampton Dellinger from his position as Special Counsel?

President Trump attempted to remove Hampton Dellinger because he wanted to assert his authority over executive agencies, arguing that the restrictions on removing the Special Counsel are unconstitutional. However, the specific reasons for Dellinger's dismissal were not provided in the termination notice.

What are the legal grounds for removing a Special Counsel like Hampton Dellinger?

A Special Counsel can only be removed for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office, as specified by federal law.

What implications does this ruling have for the balance of power between the executive branch and independent agencies?

The ruling reinforces the independence of agencies like the Office of Special Counsel, limiting the president's ability to remove agency heads without cause. This could set a precedent for future cases involving executive power over independent agencies.

What is the next step in the legal process following Judge Jackson's ruling?

The Trump administration has appealed Judge Jackson's decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The case may eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court.

5 sources·Politics

Judge Rules Trump’s Attempt to Remove Special Counsel Unlawful

A federal judge ruled that Trump’s removal of Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger was unlawful, ensuring Dellinger remains in position amid ongoing legal battles.

60%

40%

The distribution of story sources: left-leaning (blue), center (light gray), and right-leaning (red).

Mostly Reliable

The underlying sources are generally reliable but sometimes include opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.

Balanced

The underlying sources are either a balanced mix of left and right or primarily centrist.

The ruling sidelines Trump’s bid to remove Hampton Dellinger as the head of the Office of Special Counsel and is likely to set up a Supreme Court fight.
Trump's effort to fire government watchdog 'unlawful', judge rules
NBC News·18d
Reliable
This source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.
·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
The judge said the special counsel has a “unique status and mission,” which requires independence from the president to ensure he can carry out his responsibilities.
Judge rules head of watchdog agency must keep his job, says Trump’s bid to oust him was unlawful
New York Post·18d
Mostly Reliable
This source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.
·
Leans Right
This outlet slightly leans right.
The judge said the special counsel has a “unique status and mission," which requires independence from the president to ensure he can carry out his responsibilities.
Judge rules head of watchdog agency must keep his job, says Trump's bid to oust him was unlawful
ABC News·18d
Reliable
This source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.
·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
The judge said the special counsel has a "unique status and mission," which requires independence from the president to ensure he can carry out his responsibilities.
Judge rules that Trump's firing of whistleblower office chief was unlawful
CBS News·18d
Reliable
This source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.
·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
The dispute over Dellinger's firing was the first Trump legal challenge to reach the Supreme Court in his second term.
Federal judge rules Trump’s firing of head of special counsel was unlawful, will maintain his job
FOX News·18d
Mostly Reliable
This source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.
·
Leans Right
This outlet slightly leans right.

Mar 2nd, 2025, 2:31 AM ET

Summary

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

A federal judge ruled that President Trump’s termination of Hampton Dellinger, head of the Office of Special Counsel, was unlawful, reinstating him in his position. The ruling highlights the protections afforded to special counsels, only allowing removal under specific conditions. The decision emphasizes the importance of Dellinger’s role in protecting whistleblowers and federal employees from unlawful treatment. The Trump administration plans to appeal the ruling, which could escalate to the Supreme Court. Dellinger, appointed by President Biden, aims to uphold the independence and legal protections of his office amid ongoing governance challenges.

Perspectives

Compare opinions on this story from liberal (Left), conservative (Right) or center-leaning news organizations.

A federal court ruled against President Trump's attempt to remove Hampton Dellinger from the Office of Special Counsel, asserting that such dismissal was unlawful and violated statutory protections.
Judge Jackson emphasized the importance of the Special Counsel's independence to protect federal employees from unlawful actions, including retaliation for whistleblowing.
The case reflects broader themes of presidential authority and the independence of federal agencies, suggesting tensions between executive power and statutory limits.

FAQs

A list of follow-up questions readers often ask about this story.