FOX News logo
Associated Press logo
Newsmax logo
3 articles
·6M

Federal Judge Rules Against Trump's Freeze on Foreign Aid Spending

A federal judge determined President Trump's freeze on foreign aid funding overstepped constitutional bounds, ordering the administration to pay outstanding debts.

Subscribe to unlock this story

We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!

Get Started

Have an account? Sign in

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

U.S. District Judge Amir H. Ali ruled that President Trump's freeze on foreign aid funding violated constitutional authority, stating that Congress alone dictates appropriations. Despite a significant cutback in aid programs led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the ruling requires the administration to pay nearly $2 billion owed to contractors for completed work. The judge noted an excessive executive overreach, highlighting ongoing controversy regarding the funding and future of U.S. foreign aid. The decision raises questions about presidential power and the administration's commitment to international humanitarian efforts.

Written by AI using shared reports from
3 articles
.

Report issue

Pano Newsletter

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

  • A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration likely overstepped its constitutional authority by freezing foreign aid funding, emphasizing that the power to determine spending rests with Congress, not the executive branch.
  • The ruling mandates the Trump administration to pay outstanding foreign aid funds, highlighting concerns about the massive cuts made to USAID programs without congressional approval.
  • Critics argue that the drastic reduction in foreign aid programs undermines U.S. national interests and key aspects of international relations, which have relied on humanitarian assistance.

Articles (3)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

The judge ruled that the Trump administration overstepped its constitutional bounds by unilaterally deciding not to use funds allocated by Congress for foreign assistance, thus encroaching on Congress's exclusive right to decide on appropriations.

The Trump administration was ordered to pay nearly $2 billion in foreign aid reimbursements. Initially, the deadline for payment was February 26, but it was later extended by a federal judge.

The Supreme Court denied the Trump administration's request to block the payment of foreign aid funds, ruling 5-4 against the administration's appeal.

The freeze forced organizations around the world to slash services and lay off thousands of workers due to the lack of funding.

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

  • This story does not have any previous versions.