Federal Judge Blocks Trump Order Targeting Perkins Coie Law Firm
A federal judge has temporarily blocked portions of President Trump's order against Perkins Coie, citing First Amendment rights and potential irreparable harm.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedAlready subscribed? Sign in
Overview
A U.S. District Judge has issued a temporary restraining order preventing President Trump from enforcing parts of an executive order that targeted Perkins Coie. The judge, Beryl Howell, found the order likely violated First Amendment protections and posed a risk of irreparable harm to the law firm, which represented Hillary Clinton's campaign in 2016. The order sought to limit the firm's access to federal contracts and buildings, which the judge characterized as retaliatory against the firm's political affiliations. The legal battle continues, highlighting concerns over presidential powers and retaliation against political opposition.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.
Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
- A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking parts of an executive order from President Trump, which targeted Perkins Coie due to its representation of Democratic clients, emphasizing potential violations of constitutional rights.
- Judge Howell criticized the order as retaliatory, suggesting it undermines the rule of law and the integrity of the legal system by punishing firms based on political affiliations or the clients they represent.
- The ruling highlights the importance of protecting lawyers' rights to represent clients in a judicial system and warns against executive overreach that could chill legal advocacy.
Articles (9)
Center (6)
No highlight available for this article.
ABC News·4M·No highlight available for this article.
Axios·4M·No highlight available for this article.
Newsweek·4M·No highlight available for this article.
ABC News·4M·No highlight available for this article.
USA TODAY·4M·No highlight available for this article.
The Hill·4M·FAQ
The executive order sought to revoke security clearances for Perkins Coie employees, bar them from accessing government buildings, and terminate the firm's contracts with government clients.
The ruling highlights concerns over presidential powers and the potential chilling effect on law firms representing political opponents, as it could intimidate other firms from taking on similar cases.
No, this is not the first time. The Trump administration had previously targeted Covington & Burling, a firm representing former Special Counsel Jack Smith.
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.