California Appeals Court Upholds Ban on High-Capacity Gun Magazines
Court decision supports California's law prohibiting gun magazines over 10 rounds under the Second Amendment, sparking a dissent involving a YouTube video by a judge.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedHave an account? Sign in
Overview
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld California's ban on magazines with over 10 rounds, affirming it's lawful under the Second Amendment. A dissenting judge, Lawrence VanDyke, drew attention by posting a video of himself loading guns to argue against the law's rationale. The majority opinion stated that the ban aligns with historical regulations aimed at protecting public safety. California Attorney General Rob Bonta hailed the ruling as a lifesaving measure against mass shootings. The case reflects ongoing tensions in gun regulation debates in the U.S.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
- The California appeals court upheld the ban on high-capacity magazines under the Second Amendment, asserting that such magazines are not considered 'arms' or necessary components of firearms.
- Judges disagreed on the implications of the ban, with dissenting Judge VanDyke showcasing firearms in a video while challenging the majority's rationale, stating that banning large-capacity magazines could set a precedent for more arbitrary firearm restrictions.
- The decision aligns with a Supreme Court precedent emphasizing historical gun regulation, with California officials arguing that the law serves as a critical measure to reduce mass shootings by limiting the number of rounds a shooter can fire.
Articles (3)
FAQ
No FAQs available for this story.
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.