


Trump Administration Defends Signal Chat Amid Leak Controversy, Detailed Attack Plans Revealed
The Atlantic released a Signal chat revealing sensitive discussions on military strikes against Houthi militants, raising concerns about classified information.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedHave an account? Sign in
Overview
During a recent Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, DNI Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe defended use of Signal for secure military communications despite new disclosures from The Atlantic. The magazine published a chat where Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared precise details about airborne attacks on Houthi militants in Yemen just before they occurred. Critics, including lawmakers, argue the chat contained classified information, while Trump officials insist otherwise. Amid calls for accountability, President Trump and his administration downplayed the significance of these communications, framing The Atlantic's reporting as sensationalist.
Report issue

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
- Criticism of national security officials in the Trump Administration arose following a mishap where sensitive military discussions were leaked via a group chat on Signal, a platform not considered secure for classified information.
- Senators, particularly Democrats, expressed concern over the 'sloppy' nature of the incident, calling for resignations and emphasizing the need for accountability in national security matters.
- Officials, including Tulsi Gabbard and John Ratcliffe, asserted that no classified information was shared despite containing sensitive operational details regarding military strikes.
Articles (47)
Center (15)
FAQ
Critics raised concerns about security protocols, noting that using commercial apps for sensitive discussions could breach standard security practices, and questioned the appropriateness of non-secured platforms for official communications.
History
- 6M3 articles
- 6M6 articles