Supreme Court Considers Medicaid Lawsuit Rights for Planned Parenthood Access in Divided Hearing
The Supreme Court is divided on whether Medicaid beneficiaries can sue states blocking access to Planned Parenthood services, impacting vital healthcare provisions.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get Started
If the court rules in South Carolina’s favor, it would greenlight other states to remove Planned Parenthood from their own Medicaid programs.
At SCOTUS, a state defends the defunding of Planned Parenthood
World News Group·1M·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.Leans RightThis outlet slightly leans right.
The court determined that such threats violated both the First Amendment right to free expression and the constitutional right to interstate travel.
Federal Judge Halts Alabama’s Effort to Target Interstate Abortion Care
Truthout·1M·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.LeftThis outlet favors left-wing views.
Blocking the provider from Medicaid networks could effectively defund it.
Supreme Court divided over state effort to defund Planned Parenthood
FOX News·1M·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans RightThis outlet slightly leans right.
The outcome of the case could have a significant impact for Medicaid beneficiaries nationwide, Planned Parenthood clinics that rely on federal funding and anti-abortion advocates hoping states will be more aggressive about ways to cut off the funds.
Justices divided over Medicaid 'right' to choose Planned Parenthood clinics
ABC News·1M·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
A ruling in favor of Medina and South Carolina would open the gates for other states to follow suit and deny Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood.
Pro-Life Lawyers Ask Supreme Court: Should Taxpayers Be Forced to Fund Planned Parenthood?
CBN·1M·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.RightThis outlet favors right-wing views.
The Supreme Court is not deciding whether or not Planned Parenthood is qualified.
Supreme Court could boost GOP effort to defund Planned Parenthood
USA TODAY·1M·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.Other conservative states have also moved to cut Planned Parenthood out of the Medicaid program, and more would likely follow if South Carolina prevails.
Supreme Court appears divided over whether states can cut off Planned Parenthood funding
Associated Press·1M·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
In the end, it does appear more likely than not that Planned Parenthood will prevail.
The Supreme Court struggles with whether to wound Medicaid to spite Planned Parenthood
Vox·1M·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans LeftThis outlet slightly leans left.
The case has significant implications for the financial future of the largest abortion provider in the nation, as other states could eye revoking Medicaid funding should South Carolina’s challenge be successful.
Supreme Court leaves future of Planned Parenthood uncertain in Medicaid case - Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner·1M·Mostly ReliableThis source is generally reliable but sometimes includes opinion, propaganda, or minor inaccuracies.Leans RightThis outlet slightly leans right.
Preserving access to Planned Parenthood and other providers means preserving an affordable choice and quality care for an untold number of mothers and infants in South Carolina.
The Post Millennial·1M·Mixed ReliableThis source has a mixed track record—sometimes accurate but also prone to bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting.RightThis outlet favors right-wing views.
If the high court opts for that sort of ruling, it would likely cause a stampede of other conservative states cutting reproductive and sexual health clinics out of their Medicaid programs — shrinking the network of providers available to low-income patients.
Supreme Court wrestles with red state efforts to defund Planned Parenthood
Politico·1M·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
Ultimately, these seemingly narrow arguments, legal experts warn, conceal the broader consequences of the case.
US supreme court weighs restricting Medicaid payments to ‘defund’ Planned Parenthood
The Guardian·1M·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.Leans LeftThis outlet slightly leans left.
Opposition to abortion drove the state's move to defund Planned Parenthood, which came four years before the Supreme Court in 2022 rolled back the landmark abortion rights ruling in Roe v. Wade.
Supreme Court hears South Carolina dispute over attempt to defund Planned Parenthood
NBC News·1M·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.CenterThis outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.
A ruling from the conservative Supreme Court, expected by the end of June, could have profound implications for the ability of patients to access care at Planned Parenthood clinics across the country and may shed light on when Americans may sue to enforce the requirements that Congress includes in spending laws.
Supreme Court to weigh if South Carolina may cut Planned Parenthood funding | Politics
CNN·1M·ReliableThis source consistently reports facts with minimal bias, demonstrating high-quality journalism and accuracy.Leans LeftThis outlet slightly leans left.Preserving access to Planned Parenthood and other providers means preserving an affordable choice and quality care for an untold number of mothers and infants in South Carolina.
Supreme Court Mulls South Carolina Effort to Defund Planned Parenthood
Newsmax·1M·Mixed ReliableThis source has a mixed track record—sometimes accurate but also prone to bias, sensationalism, or incomplete reporting.RightThis outlet favors right-wing views.
Summary
The Supreme Court began hearings on South Carolina's bid to cut Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood, with justices split on patients' right to sue for provider access. The case, initiated by a patient seeking care, questions a patient's legal standing under federal Medicaid provisions that support provider choice. Arguments highlighted concerns over low-income access to essential services if the state prevails. With divided opinions among justices, the ruling could significantly influence similar anti-Planned Parenthood initiatives in other states, potentially reshaping Medicaid funding and patient rights nationwide.
Perspectives
The Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments in a contentious case regarding whether states can legally defund Planned Parenthood from Medicaid programs, a move that could significantly impact low-income patients' access to a range of crucial health services including cancer screenings and contraception.
Oral arguments revealed divisions among the justices, with some expressing skepticism towards South Carolina's argument that Medicaid beneficiaries have no right to sue over provider choice, indicating potential support for maintaining patient rights under the Medicaid statute.
The outcome of this case could set a precedent on the enforceability of Medicaid patient rights across the nation, leading to broad implications not only for Planned Parenthood but also for other healthcare services that low-income patients rely on.
FAQs
No FAQs available for this story.
History
- 1M
- 1M