Federal Judges Temporarily Halt Deportations of Venezuelans under Alien Enemies Act
Judges in Texas and New York block Venezuelan deportations while due process challenges proceed amid claims of misapplication of wartime law.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedHave an account? Sign in
Overview
In significant rulings, federal judges in Texas and New York have temporarily barred the deportation of Venezuelans under the Alien Enemies Act. This proactive measure aims to safeguard individuals, particularly those classified as members of the Tren de Aragua gang, who assert their innocence. These decisions stem from a recent Supreme Court ruling mandating due process for deportation cases. Civil rights groups, including the ACLU, are pushing for a broader examination of the Act’s application, which has faced criticisms for being misused. Hearings are ongoing to determine the legality and future implications of these deportations.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
- Federal judges in Texas and New York have temporarily blocked deportations of Venezuelans accused of gang membership under the Alien Enemies Act, emphasizing the need for due process and allowing challenges to their removals.
Articles (8)
Center (4)
FAQ
The Alien Enemies Act is a wartime immigration statute that has been used three times in U.S. history—during the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II—to justify the detention of individuals perceived as threats during wartime. It is now being invoked by the Trump administration to deport individuals deemed threats, such as alleged gang members.
The judges blocked the deportations due to concerns about potential immediate harm to the individuals involved and the need for them to have adequate opportunity to contest their removal. This decision follows a Supreme Court ruling that deportations under the Alien Enemies Act must include due process safeguards.
The Trump administration argues that the U.S. is being invaded by gangs, such as the Tren de Aragua, which are considered a threat. However, legal challenges assert that this is not a legitimate use of a wartime law outside of an actual war.
Ongoing legal challenges focus on whether the Alien Enemies Act can be lawfully applied to deport noncitizens not involved in wartime activities. The ACLU and other civil rights groups are pushing for a broader examination of the law's application, given its historical use only in times of war.
History
- 5M
4 articles