CBS News logo
NPR logo
CNET logo
8 articles
·5M

Zuckerberg Testifies in Antitrust Trial Challenging Meta's Acquisitions

Mark Zuckerberg faced intense questioning in a trial about Meta's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, accused of cementing a monopoly.

Subscribe to unlock this story

We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!

Get Started

Have an account? Sign in

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

In an ongoing antitrust trial, Mark Zuckerberg defended Meta's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp against FTC claims of illegal monopolistic behavior. Zuckerberg's testimony highlighted his motivations in acquiring Instagram, which he described as a competitive but innovative platform, despite internal emails suggesting concerns about its growth. The FTC argues that these acquisitions aimed to stifle competition, while Meta asserts that they operate within a highly competitive landscape, facing rivals like TikTok and YouTube. With potential consequences for Meta's business model and advertising revenue, the trial is a pivotal moment in Big Tech regulation.

Written by AI using shared reports from
8 articles
.

Report issue

Pano Newsletter

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

  • Zuckerberg's testimony during the trial is framed as evasive, with questions about Meta's acquisitions raising concerns over potential monopolistic practices.
  • The trial centers around the FTC's argument that acquisitions were aimed at eliminating competition, with Meta maintaining that it operates in a competitive environment with significant rivals like TikTok and YouTube.
  • The implications of the trial could reshape Meta's business structure, especially regarding its integration of services like Instagram and WhatsApp, potentially affecting the company's future direction.

Articles (8)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

Meta is accused of illegally monopolizing the social media market by acquiring Instagram and WhatsApp to eliminate competition rather than compete with them.

Meta argues that the acquisitions were intended to enhance the services and that it operates in a highly competitive market, facing rivals like TikTok and YouTube.

If the judge rules against Meta, the company could be forced to divest Instagram and WhatsApp, potentially impacting its business model and reducing its advertising revenue.

The failed acquisition of Snapchat is mentioned as part of Meta's strategy to acquire potential competitors, with Zuckerberg maintaining that he could have accelerated Snapchat's growth if the purchase had succeeded.

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

  • 5M
    Associated Press logo
    USA TODAY logo
    World News Group logo
    5 articles