Judge Declines Immediate Action on AP’s Access to White House Events
A federal judge refuses to enforce immediate compliance from the White House regarding AP's access, impacting freedoms under the First Amendment.
Summary
U.S. District Judge Trevor N. McFadden did not take immediate action on The Associated Press' request for enforcement of access rights after ruling its ban violated the First Amendment. The case revolves around the White House's conditional policy on AP coverage related to its reporting on the Gulf of Mexico. While allowing some access, concerns remain about potential viewpoint discrimination. The AP may pursue further challenges if compliance issues continue, emphasizing significant implications for press freedom.
Sources (3)
- The court ruling highlights significant free-speech implications related to the First Amendment, as AP's access was blocked based on editorial decisions.
- The judge is cautious in determining compliance and emphasizes the need for the government to be given the opportunity to operate in good faith regarding the new access policy.
- The gradual changes in press access may raise concerns about potential viewpoint discrimination, despite the administration's claims of neutrality.
Associated Press·1M· "…The decision comes after a new press policy at the White House."
Deadline·1M· "…Although McFadden turned down the AP’s motion, he left open the possibility of a further challenge from the news organization, warning that any non-compliance with his order would be “very problematic” and there could be “serious consequences.”"