ABC News logo
Chicago Sun-Times logo
PBS NewsHour logo
3 articles
·5M

Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Passport Policy Affecting Nonbinary Individuals

A federal judge has blocked a Trump administration policy banning the ‘X’ gender marker on passports, siding with the ACLU's challenge.

Subscribe to unlock this story

We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!

Get Started

Have an account? Sign in

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

A judge partially blocked a Trump administration policy limiting passport gender markers, ruling it violates constitutional protections. The decision supports nonbinary and transgender individuals seeking accurate identification, marking a significant legal victory for LGBTQ rights amidst ongoing debates over gender identity policies.

Written by AI using shared reports from
3 articles
.

Report issue

Pano Newsletter

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

  • A federal judge blocked the Trump administration's policy barring the use of 'X' markers on passports for nonbinary individuals, siding with the ACLU's stance on accurate identity documentation.
  • The judge ruled that the executive order's narrow definition of gender and the implications of the passport policy violate constitutional equal protection rights and lack sufficient governmental justification.
  • The ACLU highlighted that the policy could lead to discrimination, harassment, and violence against transgender Americans, indicating a broader struggle for acceptance and rights within the law.

Articles (3)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

The Trump administration argued that the policy did not violate equal protection guarantees of the Constitution and that the president has broad discretion in setting passport policy. They also claimed that plaintiffs wouldn't be harmed since they were still free to travel abroad[5].

The federal judge ruled that the policy was 'arbitrary and capricious' and 'likely violates the constitutional rights of transgender and nonbinary individuals.' The judge granted a preliminary injunction blocking the policy[1][3].

The decision allows nonbinary individuals to continue using the 'X' gender marker on passports and supports transgender individuals in accurately representing their gender on identification documents, marking a significant victory for LGBTQ rights[3][2].

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

  • This story does not have any previous versions.