Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court to Reinstate Ban on Transgender Troops Amid Ongoing Legal Battles
The Trump administration seeks Supreme Court intervention to enforce a military ban on transgender individuals, even as legal challenges to the policy continue.
Trump seeks Supreme Court intervention in transgender troops ban
Washington Examiner
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedHave an account? Sign in
Overview
On April 24, the Trump administration requested the Supreme Court's intervention to enforce a ban on transgender individuals serving in the military, amid ongoing legal challenges. Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued that delays in implementing the ban could undermine military readiness. This request follows a federal appeals court's decision to uphold an injunction blocking the policy, which several judges have deemed discriminatory. Critics highlight the lack of evidence justifying the ban, while Judge Benjamin Settle noted that many transgender service members have been serving without issue. Responses from challengers are due by May 1.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
- President Donald Trump’s administration has sought Supreme Court enforcement of a ban on transgender individuals in the military, arguing that it is essential for military readiness and aligns with national interests. Solicitor General D. John Sauer emphasized the need for the ban to take effect promptly, as the military deems it contrary to its operational efficiency.
Articles (12)
Center (5)
FAQ
The Trump administration argues that the ban is necessary for military readiness and that the current policy is inconsistent with the medical, surgical, and mental health constraints on individuals with gender dysphoria.
Solicitor General D. John Sauer approached the Supreme Court because lower court rulings have blocked the administration from enforcing the ban, and they argue that these delays could undermine military readiness.
Federal courts have issued injunctions blocking the ban, with judges arguing that it is likely unconstitutional and discriminatory. Only one of these injunctions is currently in effect, issued by a judge in Tacoma, Washington.
Challengers of the ban have been given a week to respond to the Trump administration's appeal. The response is due by May 1.
History
- 5M
5 articles