


Trump Administration Appeals to Supreme Court for Access to Social Security Data by DOGE
The Trump administration requests the Supreme Court to overturn a lower court's order blocking DOGE's access to sensitive Social Security data.
Overview
The Trump administration has appealed to the Supreme Court to allow the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to access sensitive Social Security data, previously restricted by a federal judge. This follows claims by Elon Musk that the data is necessary to combat alleged fraud within the system. The lower court, however, ruled DOGE's efforts amounted to a 'fishing expedition' and insufficient justification for accessing personal information. The Supreme Court has requested a response from the unions challenging DOGE's access by May 12, amidst a backdrop of about 200 legal challenges to Trump's policies.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
- The Trump administration is appealing to the Supreme Court for access to Social Security data, arguing that current restrictions hinder efforts to eliminate waste and fraud in government programs.
- Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) claims access to personal data is necessary to investigate fraud, despite concerns about privacy violations raised by lower courts and plaintiffs.
- The administration's emergency appeal reflects ongoing legal challenges to its agenda, with courts repeatedly scrutinizing the extent of executive power over sensitive personal information.
Articles (9)
Center (4)
FAQ
DOGE, led by Elon Musk, claims it needs access to identify and combat fraud within the Social Security system as part of broader government efficiency reforms.
The lower court blocked DOGE's access due to concerns over privacy and the need for proper justification, with some judges suggesting DOGE's efforts lacked specific evidence for accessing sensitive information.
The Trump administration has appealed to the Supreme Court after the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals maintained the block, with a divided decision and a request for the Supreme Court to intervene.
The Supreme Court has requested a response from the challenging parties by May 12, indicating that a resolution could be forthcoming after that date.
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.