EPA Announces Major Overhaul Amid Cost-Cutting Initiatives
The EPA's reorganization under Trump aims to cut costs by $300 million, prompting concerns about scientific integrity and staff reductions to 1980s levels.
Overview
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans a major reorganization under the Trump administration, aiming to cut costs by $300 million, which includes significant staffing reductions to levels not seen since the Reagan era. Critics argue that the changes jeopardize the agency's scientific independence and its ability to effectively protect human health and the environment. The reorganization emphasizes shifting scientific functions to be more aligned with political objectives, raising alarms among scientists and activists about the potential consequences for environmental health and research autonomy.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.
Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
- The EPA's reorganization aims to cut costs and enhance efficiency, potentially saving $300 million annually.
- Staffing reductions will return the EPA to levels seen during the Reagan administration, prompting concerns over research independence and environmental protection.
- The creation of new offices within the EPA is intended to align scientific efforts with policy goals, although critics warn this could politicize scientific research.
Articles (3)
Center (3)
No highlight available for this article.
NPR·2M·No highlight available for this article.
USA TODAY·2M·No highlight available for this article.
Associated Press·2M·FAQ
The EPA is eliminating its centralized Office of Research and Development, reassigning over 1,500 staff to program offices handling air, chemicals, water, and the administrator’s office. This aims to prioritize 'statutory obligations' but may increase redundancies and politicize research[1][2].
While no direct layoffs are announced under this reorganization, the administration targets reducing staffing to Reagan-era levels (11,000–14,000 employees), down from the current ~15,000. President Trump mentioned a 65% workforce cut in a separate context, which the EPA later clarified as a budget reduction goal[2][4].
The EPA recently announced 31 deregulatory actions, including measures to 'unleash American energy' and reduce costs. Administrator Zeldin described it as the 'greatest day of deregulation in U.S. history,' targeting climate policies and state collaboration[3].
Employees expressed shock, with union leaders warning of reduced capacity for disaster response and pollution monitoring. An EPA veteran stated the moves appear designed to accelerate resignations, citing early retirement offers and deferred resignations[1][4].
Critics, including former EPA officials, warn that dispersing scientific staff into policymaking offices could compromise research integrity and hinder responses to health crises, chemical risks, and climate-related disasters[1][2][4].
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.