Trump Administration Considers Suspending Habeas Corpus amid Immigration Policy Crackdown
Stephen Miller states that the administration is looking to suspend habeas corpus to streamline deportations of undocumented migrants, citing national security risks.
Summary
White House advisor Stephen Miller has announced that the Trump administration is 'actively looking at' suspending habeas corpus rights for undocumented migrants as part of a broader enforcement strategy aimed at the U.S.-Mexico border. His comments echo historical precedents where habeas corpus was suspended during times of crisis, yet legal experts argue that such actions may lack constitutional validity without congressional support. Critics warn that this move could undermine judicial oversight, especially given that federal courts have frequently challenged the administration's immigration policies, raising questions about the definition of 'invasion' Miller uses to justify such measures.
Articles (21)
- The Trump administration's suggestion to suspend habeas corpus reflects a dangerous escalation in its crackdown on immigration, leveraging fear around an 'invasion' without valid legal grounds.
- Legal scholars argue that suspending habeas corpus would be unconstitutional and undermine fundamental rights, particularly when the administration is losing in courts.
- Critics highlight that Trump's failure to respect judicial rulings and his dismissal of constitutional rights could lead to severe violations of due process for immigrants.
Salon·22d· "…Trump has tried to paint America as under attack from immigrants, but it's unclear if he can legally use this route to deport them."
PBS NewsHour·23d· "…Today, the Trump administration again escalated its fight with the courts."
CNN·23d· "…It remains unclear whether this is something the administration will actually pursue, and experts say it will likely generate legal challenges."
The Guardian·23d· "…Suspending habeas corpus would be an extremely aggressive move that would dramatically escalate the Trump administration’s efforts to attack the rule of law in American courts as it tries to deport people without giving them a chance to challenge the basis of their removals."
MSNBC·23d· "…Time will tell whether the president is seriously prepared to pursue such an extreme approach, but that this conversation is even underway is a startling reminder of just how far the United States has gone down a radical path."
PBS NewsHour·23d· No analysis available for this article
FAQ
History
- 23d
- 23d