


Menendez Brothers Granted Parole Eligibility After Resentencing
Lyle and Erik Menendez were resentenced to 50 years to life, making them eligible for parole for the first time since the 1989 murders of their parents.

The Menendez brothers had their sentences reduced. What's next?

Associated Press





A timeline of the Menendez brothers' double-murder case

Associated Press
LA judge to decide whether the Menendez brothers should be freed

Associated Press
Overview
On May 13, 2025, California Judge Michael Jesic resentenced Lyle and Erik Menendez to 50 years to life for the 1989 murders of their parents, making them eligible for parole after 35 years. The decision followed emotional statements from the brothers, who took full responsibility for their actions and expressed remorse. Prosecutors oppose their release, citing concerns about their accountability. The brothers argue their actions stemmed from childhood abuse. Their case, driven by public and family support, has regained attention partly due to a Netflix drama and ongoing media coverage. A parole hearing is scheduled for June 13.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
Left
Supporters of the Menendez brothers argue for resentencing based on an evolving understanding of the lasting impacts of childhood trauma and abuse they suffered, emphasizing their remorse and rehabilitation efforts over 35 years.
Family members and advocates contend that initial verdicts reflected societal biases and did not fully recognize the dynamics of male victimization in cases of sexual abuse.
The recent ruling for resentencing showcases a shift in public sentiment towards views of justice and rehabilitation, reflecting modern understandings of violence and trauma.
Center
Judge Michael Jesic resentenced Erik and Lyle Menendez from life without parole to 50 years to life, making them eligible for parole under California’s youthful offender law since they committed their crime under the age of 26.
The brothers' attorneys argue that they have been rehabilitated in prison, earning college degrees and starting programs to help other inmates, indicating their capability for positive contribution to society if released.
Family members of the Menendez brothers have expressed unwavering support for their release, emphasizing their remorse and the belief that 35 years is sufficient punishment.
Right
Prosecutors argue against resentencing, stating that the Menendez brothers have not taken full responsibility for their actions and are still a risk to society based on their prison behavior and past inconsistencies in their stories.
Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman believes that the brothers have not acknowledged their crimes sufficiently to warrant resentencing, asserting their claims of abuse haven't been fully substantiated.
Concerns have been raised regarding the brothers' suitability for release given recent allegations of breaching prison rules, suggesting they may pose a threat if freed.
Left
Supporters of the Menendez brothers argue for resentencing based on an evolving understanding of the lasting impacts of childhood trauma and abuse they suffered, emphasizing their remorse and rehabilitation efforts over 35 years.
Family members and advocates contend that initial verdicts reflected societal biases and did not fully recognize the dynamics of male victimization in cases of sexual abuse.
The recent ruling for resentencing showcases a shift in public sentiment towards views of justice and rehabilitation, reflecting modern understandings of violence and trauma.
Center
Judge Michael Jesic resentenced Erik and Lyle Menendez from life without parole to 50 years to life, making them eligible for parole under California’s youthful offender law since they committed their crime under the age of 26.
The brothers' attorneys argue that they have been rehabilitated in prison, earning college degrees and starting programs to help other inmates, indicating their capability for positive contribution to society if released.
Family members of the Menendez brothers have expressed unwavering support for their release, emphasizing their remorse and the belief that 35 years is sufficient punishment.
Right
Prosecutors argue against resentencing, stating that the Menendez brothers have not taken full responsibility for their actions and are still a risk to society based on their prison behavior and past inconsistencies in their stories.
Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman believes that the brothers have not acknowledged their crimes sufficiently to warrant resentencing, asserting their claims of abuse haven't been fully substantiated.
Concerns have been raised regarding the brothers' suitability for release given recent allegations of breaching prison rules, suggesting they may pose a threat if freed.
Articles (29)





























FAQ
History
- 1M19 articles
- 1M8 articles
- 1M5 articles