Supporters of the Menendez brothers argue for resentencing based on an evolving understanding of the lasting impacts of childhood trauma and abuse they suffered, emphasizing their remorse and rehabilitation efforts over 35 years.

Family members and advocates contend that initial verdicts reflected societal biases and did not fully recognize the dynamics of male victimization in cases of sexual abuse.

The recent ruling for resentencing showcases a shift in public sentiment towards views of justice and rehabilitation, reflecting modern understandings of violence and trauma.

Judge Michael Jesic resentenced Erik and Lyle Menendez from life without parole to 50 years to life, making them eligible for parole under California’s youthful offender law since they committed their crime under the age of 26.

The brothers' attorneys argue that they have been rehabilitated in prison, earning college degrees and starting programs to help other inmates, indicating their capability for positive contribution to society if released.

Family members of the Menendez brothers have expressed unwavering support for their release, emphasizing their remorse and the belief that 35 years is sufficient punishment.

Prosecutors argue against resentencing, stating that the Menendez brothers have not taken full responsibility for their actions and are still a risk to society based on their prison behavior and past inconsistencies in their stories.

Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman believes that the brothers have not acknowledged their crimes sufficiently to warrant resentencing, asserting their claims of abuse haven't been fully substantiated.

Concerns have been raised regarding the brothers' suitability for release given recent allegations of breaching prison rules, suggesting they may pose a threat if freed.