


Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan Pleads Not Guilty to Federal Charges of Obstruction
Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan pleads not guilty to charges of helping an undocumented immigrant evade arrest by immigration agents in her courtroom.


Overview
Wisconsin judge Hannah Dugan entered a not guilty plea to federal charges of obstruction, accused of aiding an undocumented immigrant evade arrest during a court appearance. Dugan allegedly directed the immigrant, Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, and his lawyer to exit through a back door as Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents attempted to arrest him. This case highlights ongoing tensions between local officials and federal immigration enforcement under the Trump administration. Dugan faces potential prison time if convicted, while protests outside the courthouse express support for her actions and criticism of federal overreach.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
Left
The case against Judge Dugan reflects the overreach of the Trump administration's aggressive immigration policies and has sparked protests supporting her actions.
Supporters view the charges as an attack on the judiciary, arguing that ICE should not conduct arrests in courthouses, which they claim undermines due process for marginalized communities.
Those advocating for Dugan see her as a protector of vulnerable individuals facing immigration enforcement.
Center
Judge Hannah Dugan pleaded not guilty to charges of obstructing ICE agents seeking to arrest an undocumented immigrant and is accused of helping him evade capture in her courthouse.
Her attorneys argue she acted in her official capacity as a judge and should have immunity from prosecution for her actions during a judicial proceeding.
The case highlights tensions between state sovereignty and federal immigration enforcement, particularly under the Trump administration's policies.
Right
Judge Dugan's actions are viewed as a direct obstruction of federal law enforcement, and her alleged assistance to an undocumented immigrant calls into question her adherence to the rule of law.
Critics of Dugan believe that the judicial immunity argument may not hold, as her conduct may not be deemed 'official acts' within her judicial role.
The Trump administration's stance is that local officials who hinder immigration enforcement risk severe repercussions, emphasizing a strict approach to illegal immigration.
Left
The case against Judge Dugan reflects the overreach of the Trump administration's aggressive immigration policies and has sparked protests supporting her actions.
Supporters view the charges as an attack on the judiciary, arguing that ICE should not conduct arrests in courthouses, which they claim undermines due process for marginalized communities.
Those advocating for Dugan see her as a protector of vulnerable individuals facing immigration enforcement.
Center
Judge Hannah Dugan pleaded not guilty to charges of obstructing ICE agents seeking to arrest an undocumented immigrant and is accused of helping him evade capture in her courthouse.
Her attorneys argue she acted in her official capacity as a judge and should have immunity from prosecution for her actions during a judicial proceeding.
The case highlights tensions between state sovereignty and federal immigration enforcement, particularly under the Trump administration's policies.
Right
Judge Dugan's actions are viewed as a direct obstruction of federal law enforcement, and her alleged assistance to an undocumented immigrant calls into question her adherence to the rule of law.
Critics of Dugan believe that the judicial immunity argument may not hold, as her conduct may not be deemed 'official acts' within her judicial role.
The Trump administration's stance is that local officials who hinder immigration enforcement risk severe repercussions, emphasizing a strict approach to illegal immigration.
Articles (9)








