James Comey Interviewed by Secret Service Over Controversial Social Media Post
Former FBI Director James Comey met with the Secret Service to discuss an Instagram post viewed as a threat to President Trump, which Comey denied.
James Comey interviewed by Secret Service over ‘8647’ post
Washington Examiner
Trump Reacts To James Comey’s ‘8647’ Post
Daily Caller
Former FBI director Comey investigated for alleged Trump…
World News Group
Trump fires off on Comey’s ‘8647’ message: ‘That meant assassination’
Washington Examiner
James Comey’s Insane ‘86 47’ Threat
The American Spectator
Overview
Former FBI Director James Comey was interviewed by the Secret Service regarding a now-deleted Instagram post that Republicans claim suggests violence against President Trump. The post's imagery reportedly spelled '86 47', with '86' interpreted as slang for 'get rid of,' including implications of assassination. Comey has denied any violent intent. Trump described the post as deliberate, expressing doubt over Comey's competence. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem confirmed the investigation, stating that protecting the president is paramount. Legal experts noted the challenges in prosecuting such incidents based on free speech rights.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.
Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
Left
There are not enough sources from this perspective to provide an analysis.
Center
The ongoing investigation into Comey's post highlights the complexities of interpreting political rhetoric, particularly in a polarized climate where meanings may be contested based on political bias.
Despite Comey's assertion that he did not intend to communicate violence, the reaction from Trump and his allies raises important concerns about accountability and the limits of free speech in political discourse.
The mixed responses from different political figures illuminate the division within the political sphere, drawing attention to the necessity for a more nuanced understanding of language that could be perceived as threatening.
Right
Republican leaders, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, have expressed serious concern over Comey's post, viewing it as a provocative statement that warrants a federal investigation and potential consequences for Comey.
The interpretation of Comey's message as a threat against President Trump has led Homeland Security and FBI officials to probe the matter, emphasizing the administration's commitment to protecting high-profile political figures.
Republican lawmakers are taking action through Congress, criticizing Comey's conduct as irresponsible and inciting violence, thereby calling for significant repercussions for his actions.
Left
There are not enough sources from this perspective to provide an analysis.
Center
The ongoing investigation into Comey's post highlights the complexities of interpreting political rhetoric, particularly in a polarized climate where meanings may be contested based on political bias.
Despite Comey's assertion that he did not intend to communicate violence, the reaction from Trump and his allies raises important concerns about accountability and the limits of free speech in political discourse.
The mixed responses from different political figures illuminate the division within the political sphere, drawing attention to the necessity for a more nuanced understanding of language that could be perceived as threatening.
Right
Republican leaders, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, have expressed serious concern over Comey's post, viewing it as a provocative statement that warrants a federal investigation and potential consequences for Comey.
The interpretation of Comey's message as a threat against President Trump has led Homeland Security and FBI officials to probe the matter, emphasizing the administration's commitment to protecting high-profile political figures.
Republican lawmakers are taking action through Congress, criticizing Comey's conduct as irresponsible and inciting violence, thereby calling for significant repercussions for his actions.
Articles (49)
Rolling Stone·1M·No highlight available for this article.
The Guardian·1M·No highlight available for this article.
The Guardian·1M·No highlight available for this article.
TIME Magazine·1M·No highlight available for this article.
CNN·1M·No highlight available for this article.
CNN·1M·No highlight available for this article.
NBC News·1M·No highlight available for this article.
USA TODAY·1M·No highlight available for this article.
USA TODAY·1M·No highlight available for this article.
USA TODAY·1M·No highlight available for this article.
CBS News·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Fortune·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Associated Press·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Associated Press·1M·No highlight available for this article.
BBC News·1M·No highlight available for this article.
BBC News·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Reason·1M·No highlight available for this article.
World News Group·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Boston Herald·1M·No highlight available for this article.
FOX News·1M·No highlight available for this article.
FOX News·1M·No highlight available for this article.
FOX News·1M·No highlight available for this article.
FOX News·1M·No highlight available for this article.
FOX News·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Washington Examiner·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Washington Examiner·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Washington Examiner·1M·No highlight available for this article.
New York Sun·1M·No highlight available for this article.
The Blaze·1M·No highlight available for this article.
The Blaze·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Newsmax·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Newsmax·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Newsmax·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Newsmax·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Newsmax·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Newsmax·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Breitbart News·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Daily Caller·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Daily Caller·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Daily Caller·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Daily Caller·1M·No highlight available for this article.
CBN·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Daily Signal·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Western Journal·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Western Journal·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Western Journal·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Western Journal·1M·No highlight available for this article.
The American Spectator·1M·No highlight available for this article.
Infowars·1M·No highlight available for this article.
FAQ
History
- 1M41 articles
- 1M35 articles
- 1M35 articles
- 1M23 articles
- 1M14 articles