


Iran's Khamenei Dismisses U.S. Criticism, Signals Skepticism on Nuclear Talks
Iran's Supreme Leader reiterates commitment to uranium enrichment, challenges U.S. demands, as indirect negotiations continue amid ongoing tensions.
Overview
In a recent address, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei dismissed U.S. demands to halt uranium enrichment, labeling them as “nonsense.” Khamenei expressed skepticism towards the ongoing indirect negotiations with the U.S., noting previous unsuccessful talks during Ebrahim Raisi's presidency. Iran's Foreign Ministry is currently reviewing proposals for further discussions without committing to a specific timeline, as tensions persist. The U.S. insists that any agreement includes a cessation of uranium enrichment, while Iran maintains its right to enrich under international treaties. Both sides acknowledge the challenging dynamics as they navigate this complex diplomatic landscape.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
Analysis unavailable for this viewpoint.
Articles (6)
Center (2)
FAQ
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei dismissed U.S. demands to halt uranium enrichment as 'nonsense' and emphasized that Iran will not seek permission from anyone to continue its uranium enrichment program, asserting Iran's independent policies and direction.
The nuclear negotiations between the U.S. and Iran are ongoing with indirect talks continuing, but Iran’s Foreign Ministry is reviewing proposals for further discussions without committing to a specific timeline, and there is skepticism about the outcome based on previous unsuccessful talks during Ebrahim Raisi's presidency.
The U.S. insists that any nuclear agreement with Iran must include a cessation of uranium enrichment activities by Iran.
Iran has maintained its right to enrich uranium under international treaties, rejected the U.S. demand to stop enrichment, called proposals like snapback sanctions demands from European countries illegal, and expressed frustration with the contradictory and constantly changing positions of the U.S. side.
History
- 2M3 articles