Washington Examiner logo
Boston Herald logo
NBC News logo
10 articles
·1M

Judge Blocks Trump's Executive Order Against Jenner & Block, Citing First Amendment Violations

A federal judge ruled Trump's executive order against Jenner & Block unconstitutional, emphasizing retaliation for the firm's legal work and First Amendment rights.

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

U.S. District Judge John Bates permanently blocked President Trump's executive order against Jenner & Block, declaring it unconstitutional retaliation for the firm's legal work. Bates criticized the order for infringing on First Amendment rights and noted it targeted the firm due to its advocacy and past employment of a lawyer involved in the Mueller investigation. This ruling follows a similar decision against Perkins Coie, highlighting ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and law firms opposing its policies. Bates also pointed out that some firms preemptively negotiated with the administration to avoid sanctions.

Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Pano Newsletter

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

  • The article presents a positive tone regarding the judicial ruling against Trump's executive order.
  • It emphasizes the protection of constitutional rights and the importance of legal representation.
  • The judge's decision is seen as a victory for independent legal counsel.

Articles (10)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

Center (4)

"…U.S. District Judge John Bates said going after law firms the way Trump has 'is doubly violative of the Constitution' because it targets Jenner & Block due to the causes the firm champions."

Trump executive order targeting Jenner law firm unconstitutional, judge rules
NBC NewsNBC News·1M·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…The ruling from U.S. District Judge John Bates marks the second time this month that a judge has struck down a Trump executive order against a prominent firm."

Judge blocks Trump executive order targeting Chicago law firm
Chicago TribuneChicago Tribune·1M·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…The ruling from U.S. District Judge John Bates marks the second time this month that a judge has struck down a Trump executive order against a prominent firm."

Judge blocks another Trump executive order targeting a major law firm
Associated PressAssociated Press·1M·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…U.S. District Judge John Bates, who was appointed by President George W. Bush and is based in Washington, D.C., said the executive order is "violative of the Constitution" and found that the order infringes on the First, Fifth and Sixth amendments."

Judge strikes down Trump order targeting law firm Jenner & Block, calling parts of it a "screed"
CBS NewsCBS News·1M·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

President Trump targeted Jenner & Block because the firm had employed Andrew Weissmann, a prosecutor who worked on Robert Mueller’s team investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election, and due to the firm’s advocacy and clients, which were perceived as opposing the administration.

Judge Bates ruled that the executive order violated the First Amendment by singling out Jenner & Block on the basis of its legal advocacy, client representation, and the past employment of an attorney involved in investigating election interference.

Yes, several other law firms have faced similar executive orders. Many have reached deals with the administration, pledging nearly $1 billion to pro bono work to avoid sanctions, while others, like WilmerHale, have sued.

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

  • 1M
    Chicago Tribune logo
    Associated Press logo
    CBS News logo
    6 articles