


Elon Musk's Departure from DOGE: Impact and Controversies Unfold
Elon Musk exits the Department of Government Efficiency amid drug use allegations and unclear budget impacts, while maintaining ties to Trump.



Musk seen with black eye at Trump press conference, blames his son X

Washington Examiner

Musk dodges questions about drug use after New York Times report

Washington Examiner

Elon Musk Says Goodbye With a Black Eye

Mother Jones

Musk’s Government Job Did Not Curb His Ketamine Habit

New York Magazine

Overview
Elon Musk's tenure at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has officially ended, with unclear impacts on federal spending despite claims of significant savings. While Musk aimed to cut $2 trillion from the budget, current estimates suggest only $170 billion in savings, with some agency budgets actually increasing. His departure follows a New York Times report detailing his frequent ketamine use during the 2024 campaign, which he dismissed. Despite stepping back, Musk will continue to advise Trump, who praised his contributions. The future of DOGE remains uncertain as Musk's influence persists in government contracts.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
Left
The articles reflect mixed sentiments about Elon Musk, with some praising his contributions while others criticize his alleged drug use.
Concerns about Musk's drug use during the campaign raise questions about his public image and professional responsibilities.
The relationship between Musk and Trump is complex, with mutual praise overshadowed by controversies and criticisms of Musk's leadership.
Center
The article presents a neutral tone regarding Elon Musk's drug use allegations and his role in the Trump administration.
It highlights Musk's controversial statements and the mixed reactions they provoke, showcasing a complex public perception.
The coverage reflects a balanced view, avoiding strong positive or negative bias in discussing Musk's actions.
Right
The article presents a negative view of The New York Times, labeling it biased and unreliable.
It emphasizes allegations against Elon Musk while defending him and Trump.
The tone is accusatory, suggesting a deliberate attempt to discredit Musk and Trump.
Left
The articles reflect mixed sentiments about Elon Musk, with some praising his contributions while others criticize his alleged drug use.
Concerns about Musk's drug use during the campaign raise questions about his public image and professional responsibilities.
The relationship between Musk and Trump is complex, with mutual praise overshadowed by controversies and criticisms of Musk's leadership.
Center
The article presents a neutral tone regarding Elon Musk's drug use allegations and his role in the Trump administration.
It highlights Musk's controversial statements and the mixed reactions they provoke, showcasing a complex public perception.
The coverage reflects a balanced view, avoiding strong positive or negative bias in discussing Musk's actions.
Right
The article presents a negative view of The New York Times, labeling it biased and unreliable.
It emphasizes allegations against Elon Musk while defending him and Trump.
The tone is accusatory, suggesting a deliberate attempt to discredit Musk and Trump.
Articles (22)






















FAQ
History
- 16d18 articles
- 16d10 articles
- 16d5 articles