Slate logo
Slate logo
The Blaze logo
30 articles
·11d

Supreme Court Rules on Discrimination Standards for Majority Groups in Ames Case

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that majority group members can file discrimination lawsuits without heightened evidentiary standards, impacting future cases across the U.S.


Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court unanimously decided that majority group members, including heterosexuals, can file discrimination lawsuits without facing higher evidentiary standards. The case, Marlean Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, challenged previous requirements for majority group plaintiffs. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson stated that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act applies equally to all individuals, regardless of group identity. This ruling overturns a lower court's decision that imposed a 'background circumstances' requirement, allowing Ames to pursue her case after being denied a promotion and later demoted due to her sexual orientation. The ruling emphasizes that the burdens of proof in discrimination cases should not vary based on the identity of the plaintiff, reinforcing the principle that justice must be universal.

Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Pano Newsletter

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

The articles highlight a Supreme Court ruling that supports equal protection against discrimination for all individuals.

There is a mixed sentiment regarding the implications of the ruling on workplace equality and discrimination laws.

The decisions reflect a significant shift in legal interpretation, impacting claims of reverse discrimination and workplace diversity discussions.

Articles (30)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

LeftCenterRight
MSNBC
Slate
Slate
Slate
HuffPost
Vox
PBS NewsHour
The Guardian
TIME Magazine
Al Jazeera
CNN
NBC News
NPR
USA TODAY
CBS News
Fortune
Associated Press
BBC News
Reason
World News Group
Boston Herald
Christian Post
FOX News
Washington Examiner
New York Sun
The Daily Wire
The Blaze
Newsmax
Daily Signal
Western Journal
Supreme Court revives straight woman's workplace discrimination claim
MSNBCMSNBC·11d·
Left
This outlet favors left-wing views.

"…The court said the additional requirement is inconsistent with federal law and Supreme Court precedent, so it sent the case back for further litigation."

Guns, Religious Liberty, Discrimination… Unanimity???
SlateSlate·11d·
Left
This outlet favors left-wing views.

"…Together, they reveal the strategy emerging from the court’s liberals this term."

The Supreme Court May Have Granted The Trump Administration A Huge Gift
HuffPostHuffPost·11d·
Leans Left
This outlet slightly leans left.

"…Background circumstances must show that the person or people outside the majority are engaged in an unusual pattern of discrimination against the majority."

SCOTUS Eases Path for 'Reverse Discrimination' Lawsuits
TIME MagazineTIME Magazine·11d·
Leans Left
This outlet slightly leans left.

"…The Supreme Court said in its ruling that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964... draws no distinctions between majority-group plaintiffs and minority-group plaintiffs."

US Supreme Court clears greater path for ‘reverse discrimination’ claims
Al JazeeraAl Jazeera·11d·
Leans Left
This outlet slightly leans left.

"…The decision reverses a previous ruling by a lower court stating that plaintiffs from some majority groups must show 'background circumstances' to demonstrate that their employer is 'that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority'."

Supreme Court revives straight woman's reverse discrimination claim
NBC NewsNBC News·11d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…The unanimous ruling could make it easier in some parts of the country for people belonging to majority groups to bring such 'reverse discrimination' claims."

Supreme Court sides with straight woman in 'reverse discrimination' case
USA TODAYUSA TODAY·11d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…The Supreme Court said the "background circumstances rule" can't be squared with the text of the law or the court's previous rulings."

Supreme Court sides with Ohio woman in reverse discrimination case
CBS NewsCBS News·11d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…The ruling from the Supreme Court makes it easier to pursue claims of reverse discrimination in 20 states and the District of Columbia that are covered by federal courts of appeals that still applied the standard."

Supreme Court makes it easier to claim 'reverse discrimination' in employment, in a case from Ohio
Associated PressAssociated Press·11d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…The justices’ decision affects lawsuits in 20 states and the District of Columbia where, until now, courts had set a higher bar when members of a majority group, including those who are white and heterosexual, sue for discrimination under federal law."

Supreme Court rules for heterosexual woman in discrimination case
BBC NewsBBC News·11d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…The court concluded that anti-discrimination and equal protection laws were meant to apply to all Americans."

SCOTUS rules for woman who fought antiheterosexual bias
World News GroupWorld News Group·11d·
Leans Right
This outlet slightly leans right.

"…The justices vacated the lower court’s previous ruling and sent Ames’ case back for a new decision."

Supreme Court makes it easier to claim ‘reverse discrimination’ in employment, in a case from Ohio
Boston HeraldBoston Herald·11d·
Leans Right
This outlet slightly leans right.

"…The justices’ decision affects lawsuits in 20 states and the District of Columbia where, until now, courts had set a higher bar when members of a majority group, including those who are white and heterosexual, sue for discrimination under federal law."

Supreme Court rules unanimously in favor of straight Ohio woman who claimed discrimination
FOX NewsFOX News·11d·
Leans Right
This outlet slightly leans right.

"…The ruling strikes down the Sixth Circuit Court's 'background circumstances' rule, which had required majority groups in protected classes to show special evidence of discrimination."

Supreme Court: 'Reverse discrimination' should not face higher standard
Washington ExaminerWashington Examiner·11d·
Leans Right
This outlet slightly leans right.

"…The unanimous decision remanded the discrimination case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further proceedings without the higher standard implemented against Ames."

Justices Jackson and Thomas, in a Rare Concurrence, Say ‘Majority’ Americans Can Sue for ‘Reverse Discrimination’
New York SunNew York Sun·11d·
Right
This outlet favors right-wing views.

"…The Supreme Court rejected this approach, emphasizing that Title VII’s protections apply equally to all individuals and that courts should not impose additional burdens on majority-group plaintiffs."

Supreme Court Unanimously Rules In Favor Of Straight Woman In ‘Reverse Discrimination’ Lawsuit
The Daily WireThe Daily Wire·11d·
Right
This outlet favors right-wing views.

"…The unanimous ruling puts an end to a standard used in 20 states and the District of Columbia that imposed a higher burden of proof on white, male, and straight individuals who claimed to be the victims of discrimination on the basis of those identities."

Supreme Court Eases Path for 'Reverse Discrimination' Cases
NewsmaxNewsmax·12d·
Right
This outlet favors right-wing views.

"…The justices' decision affects lawsuits in 20 states and the District of Columbia where, until now, courts had set a higher bar when members of a majority group, including those who are white and heterosexual, sue for discrimination under federal law."

Supreme Court Protects Majority Groups From Discrimination
Daily SignalDaily Signal·11d·
Right
This outlet favors right-wing views.

"…The Supreme Court has recognized that Title VII nondiscrimination protections apply equally to majority group individuals, a precedent set by the 2009 case Ricci v. DeStefano, where the justices ruled that discriminatory effects resulting from diversity efforts are illegal."

Clarence Thomas Scolds Lower Courts for Using 'Judge-Made Doctrines' as Supreme Court Issues Unanimous Ruling
Western JournalWestern Journal·11d·
Far Right
This outlet leans heavily toward right-wing views.

"…The Supreme Court’s case law makes clear that the standard for proving disparate treatment under Title VII does not vary based on whether or not the plaintiff is a member of a majority group."

FAQ

A list of follow-up questions readers often ask about this story.

History

A summary of how this story has evolved over the last 24 hours.

  • 11d
    Fortune logo
    Christian Post logo
    New York Sun logo
    25 articles
  • 11d
    TIME Magazine logo
    Washington Examiner logo
    BBC News logo
    22 articles