Trump Proposes $9.4 Billion Budget Cuts Amid Bipartisan Concerns
President Trump seeks to cut $9.4 billion in spending, facing bipartisan pushback over potential impacts on public media and humanitarian aid.
Senate GOP takes Trump tax promises off megabill chopping block
Washington Examiner
Senate mulls spending cuts for Big Beautiful Bill
World News Group
Overview
- President Trump is proposing $9.4 billion in budget cuts, which require approval from both chambers of Congress to take effect.
- The proposal includes cuts to public media, which the White House claims is politically biased and unnecessary.
- Democrats and humanitarian groups criticize the cuts as harmful to vulnerable populations and public services.
- Local public television stations warn of potential closures if the budget cuts are enacted.
- Senate Republicans are exploring separating tax exemptions and spending cuts into different bills, amid concerns over impacts on rural hospitals.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.
Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
Oppose proposed budget cuts that threaten humanitarian aid and public media funding.
President Donald Trump is seeking to cancel $9.4 billion in approved congressional spending.
Approval from both chambers of Congress is required for the package of 21 budget rescissions to take effect.
Republicans are optimistic that the success of the initial rescission package will lead to the implementation of more in the future.
Democrats criticize the cuts as inhumane and argue that they would deprive hungry and sick people worldwide of life-saving support.
The White House believes that the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense.
The association representing local public television stations cautions that many stations may be forced to shut down if the GOP bill is approved.
Multiple humanitarian aid groups are urging lawmakers to reject the proposed budget cuts.
Articles (10)
Center (4)
"…The White House is betting that cutting federal investments in public media and some foreign aid programs will prove politically popular."
Chicago Tribune·20d·"…The White House is betting that cutting federal investments in public media and some foreign aid programs will prove politically popular."
ABC News·20d·"…The White House is betting that cutting federal investments in public media and some foreign aid programs will prove politically popular."
Associated Press·20d·"…Republican senators are airing concerns about different parts of the legislation, including cuts to Medicaid, changes to food aid and the impact on the deficit."
ABC News·22d·FAQ
The proposed cuts primarily target funding for public media (such as NPR and PBS) and humanitarian aid programs, specifically including significant reductions in the U.S. Agency for International Development’s Development Assistance program.
The White House argues that cuts to public media address perceived political bias and unnecessary spending, while Republicans frame the cuts as modest and part of broader efforts to increase government efficiency. Democrats and humanitarian groups oppose the cuts, arguing they would harm vulnerable populations and vital public services.
For the $9.4 billion in cuts to take effect, the proposed package of budget rescissions must be approved by both the House and Senate. If either chamber rejects the package, the spending remains in place.
Local public television stations warn that the proposed cuts could lead to station closures, loss of programming, and reduction of educational and informational services for communities.
Senate Republicans are considering separating tax exemptions from the spending cuts and passing them in different bills, in response to concerns about impacts on rural hospitals and other services.
History
- 21d
4 articles - 22d3 articles
