


Pentagon's Controversial Contingency Plans and Military Deployments Under Scrutiny
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth faces intense questioning over Pentagon's invasion plans for Greenland, troop deployments, and Air Force One budget amid political tensions.
Overview
- Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed Pentagon's contingency plans for potential invasions of Greenland and Panama, raising concerns among lawmakers.
- Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee engaged in heated discussions with Hegseth regarding these classified military plans.
- A Pentagon watchdog report on Hegseth's communication practices is expected, particularly concerning the Greenland invasion plans.
- Hegseth faced scrutiny over military support for Ukraine and troop deployments, emphasizing the importance of defending democratic allies.
- California Governor Gavin Newsom is suing to remove federal troops from Los Angeles, highlighting tensions over military presence and immigration enforcement.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
Emphasizes Pentagon's contingency plans for potential military action in Greenland and Panama.
Articles (9)
Center (4)
FAQ
The potential invasion plans for Greenland and Panama are tied to national security concerns and strategic interests. President Trump has expressed interest in annexing Greenland for national security purposes and possibly reasserting U.S. control over the Panama Canal.
Lawmakers from both parties expressed alarm and sought clarification on the Pentagon's stance regarding Greenland and Panama. Rep. Mike Turner and Rep. Adam Smith were among those who questioned Hegseth's ambiguous responses.
Besides the Greenland and Panama plans, Hegseth is also facing scrutiny over military support for Ukraine, troop deployments, and a Pentagon watchdog report on his communication practices.
History
- 20d5 articles