Supreme Court Revives Lawsuit Over FBI's Mistaken Home Raid
The Supreme Court unanimously allows an Atlanta family to revive their lawsuit against the FBI for a 2017 mistaken raid on their home.
Overview
- The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Hilliard Toi Cliatt and Curtrina Martin, allowing them to revive their lawsuit against the FBI for a mistaken raid.
- The FBI raided the wrong home in Atlanta in October 2017 due to a GPS error, leading to the family's lawsuit.
- Justice Neil Gorsuch authored the unanimous opinion, highlighting potential liability for law enforcement under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
- Public interest groups are advocating for broader legal avenues for accountability in law enforcement cases following this ruling.
- The case has been sent back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit for further review and consideration.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.
Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
Emphasizes the Supreme Court's unanimous decision allowing a family to sue the FBI for a wrongful raid.
Justice Gorsuch confirmed that Congress has allowed for potential liability when law enforcement officers commit certain actions, but noted exceptions to when they can be sued under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of allowing a Georgia family to revive their lawsuit after their home was mistakenly raided by the FBI.
The plaintiffs have fought for years for the right to sue the government over the break-in.
Articles (11)
Center (6)
"…The Supreme Court on Thursday resurrected that lawsuit, unanimously ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit had settled on a faulty analysis when it barred Martin and Cliatt from suing in April 2024."
Reason·1M·"…The Supreme Court said their case can proceed under an exception in the law."
ABC News·1M·"…The Supreme Court sent a case involving an Atlanta family seeking to sue the FBI for raiding their house back to a lower court for more consideration, but it left unresolved the broader question of how much protection from lawsuits the courts should give to law enforcement officers who make mistakes on the job."
USA TODAY·1M·"…The ruling marks a narrow win for Toi Cliatt, his former girlfriend Trina Martina and her son Gabe Watson, who were all present in the house during the October 2017 encounter."
NBC News·1M·"…On Thursday, it took a different course."
NPR·1M·"…The Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Thursday to revive a lawsuit filed after a predawn 2017 raid in which armed members of an FBI SWAT team smashed in a front door and set off a flashbang grenade, pointing guns at a couple and terrifying a 7-year-old boy before realizing they were in the wrong house."
Associated Press·1M·FAQ
The FTCA is a legal framework that allows individuals to sue the federal government for wrongful acts committed by federal employees under certain conditions. For law enforcement officers, the FTCA provides a 'law enforcement proviso,' which allows lawsuits for intentional torts like false arrest or assault if committed within the scope of their duties. However, exceptions like the discretionary function doctrine can limit liability.
History
- 1M9 articles
