The Guardian logo
FOX News logo
The Guardian logo
80 articles
·17d

Legal Battles Erupt Over Trump's Deployment of National Guard in California

President Trump's deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles faces legal challenges, with judges ruling his actions illegal and ordering control to be returned to Governor Newsom.

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

  • President Trump deployed National Guard troops to Los Angeles amid protests, claiming it was necessary to protect federal property and personnel.
  • California Governor Gavin Newsom opposed the deployment, leading to a lawsuit and a federal judge ruling that Trump acted illegally.
  • Multiple judges have ruled that Trump's actions exceeded his authority and violated the Tenth Amendment, ordering the return of control to Newsom.
  • An appeals court temporarily blocked a ruling to return control of the National Guard to California, allowing Trump to maintain some deployment.
  • The situation highlights tensions between state and federal authority, with ongoing protests against immigration enforcement and Trump's military actions.

Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.

Pano Newsletter

Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

Emphasizes Governor Newsom's criticism of Trump's illegal National Guard deployment and immigration policies.

The President's actions were deemed illegal for exceeding his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Reason logo
Reason logo
2 articles
100%

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem remains committed to continuing the Trump administration's immigration crackdown despite ongoing unrest in the U.S.

Associated Press logo
ABC News logo
2 articles
100%

A judge ordered the president to return control of National Guard troops to California following protests over the immigration crackdown.

Associated Press logo
ABC News logo
2 articles
100%

A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order stating that the deployment of the Guard was illegal, violating the Tenth Amendment and exceeding President Trump's statutory authority.

Associated Press logo
ABC News logo
2 articles
100%

Gov. Gavin Newsom praised the order as a test of democracy that was passed before being blocked.

Associated Press logo
ABC News logo
2 articles
100%

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly defended the president's actions as within his powers and criticized the federal judge's order for endangering federal officials.

Associated Press logo
ABC News logo
2 articles
100%

Noem confirmed that immigration raids with thousands of targets will proceed despite protests.

Associated Press logo
ABC News logo
2 articles
100%

Noem criticized Padilla's interruption as inappropriate.

Associated Press logo
ABC News logo
2 articles
100%

The administration is willing to deploy troops to other cities for immigration enforcement and controlling disturbances.

Associated Press logo
ABC News logo
2 articles
100%

Governor Gavin Newsom criticized President Trump for illegally deploying California's National Guard without consultation.

The Economist logo
Reason logo
HuffPost logo
3 articles
67%

Articles (80)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

Center (20)

"…The brief detention marked the first time federal troops have detained a civilian since they were deployed to the nation’s second-largest city by President Donald Trump in response to protests over the administration’s immigration arrests."

Marines temporarily detain man while guarding LA federal building
Associated PressAssociated Press·18d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…The protests in Los Angeles have calmed down, but they’ve spread to other cities."

The LA protests, Donald Trump, and immigration
The EconomistThe Economist·18d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…The move is another sign of the increasingly militarized response to unrest surrounding Trump's policies."

Missouri activates National Guard as states brace for anti-Trump protests
USA TODAYUSA TODAY·18d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…The district court's order improperly impinges on the Commander in Chief's supervision of military operations, countermands a military directive to officers in the field, and puts federal officers (and others) in harm's way."

Judge Grants TRO Against President Trump's Federalizing California National Guard [FURTHER UPDATE: Ninth Circuit Grants Stay]
ReasonReason·18d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…The appeals court's decision does not mean it will ultimately side with Trump, but it leaves control of the Guard in Trump's hands for the time being."

Court sides with Trump over control of National Guard in California: Live updates
USA TODAYUSA TODAY·18d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…Americans are divided over President Donald Trump's decision to activate the military to respond to protests against his crackdown on migrants, with about half supportive of the move, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll that closed on Thursday."

Americans split on Trump's use of military in ICE protests, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
USA TODAYUSA TODAY·18d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…The hypocrisy of his calling out California Gov. Gavin Newsom and claiming the state is out of control will be highlighted by the fact that Trump says the same thing about red-state governors dealing with widespread protests."

Trump’s throwing himself a parade while red and blue states join LA in protest | Opinion
USA TODAYUSA TODAY·19d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…The order, which takes effect at noon Friday, said the deployment of the Guard was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded Trump’s statutory authority."

Judge says Trump illegally deployed National Guard to LA
Military TimesMilitary Times·19d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…The district court's order improperly impinges on the Commander in Chief's supervision of military operations, countermands a military directive to officers in the field, and puts federal officers (and others) in harm's way."

Judge Grants TRO Against President Trump's Federalizing California National Guard [UPDATE: Stay Application Filed]
ReasonReason·19d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…Breyer said the federal government exceeded its authority because it did not notify Newsom, as the statute cited by the administration requires, and wrote that Trump’s actions were illegal, “both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”"

Judge blocks Trump administration from deploying members of California National Guard in L.A., pauses own order
NBC NewsNBC News·19d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration's deployment of California's National Guard to Los Angeles and called the move illegal."

Trump administration blocked from deploying National Guard to LA
BBC NewsBBC News·19d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

"…The Republican Texas governor’s move stands in sharp contrast to California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, who has publicly clashed with Trump over his decision to deploy National Guard and Marine personnel in Los Angeles."

Texas governor deploys 5,000 Guardsmen ahead of ‘No Kings’ protests
Military TimesMilitary Times·19d·
Center
This outlet is balanced or reflects centrist views.

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

President Trump cited federal statutes that allow the use of National Guard troops to suppress the 'danger of a rebellion' or to enforce federal laws when 'regular forces' are unavailable, arguing that recent protests constituted a threat justifying federal intervention[1].

The federal judge ruled that Trump’s deployment was illegal because the sporadic violence seen during protests did not meet the legal definition of 'rebellion' required to override state authority and that the Constitution and Title 10 require the governor's consent for such federalization, which was not obtained[1].

Governor Newsom strongly opposed the deployment, stating that it violated California’s sovereignty and his authority over the National Guard. He accused Trump of overstepping federal power and filed a lawsuit to regain control of the National Guard[2].

The deployment of National Guard troops led to a significant escalation in protest numbers, with crowds growing from over 250 to more than 3,000 as demonstrators rallied against the federal intervention and immigration enforcement[2].

While a federal judge ruled to return control of the National Guard to Governor Newsom, an appeals court has temporarily blocked this decision, allowing President Trump to maintain some deployment pending further legal review[1].

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

  • 18d
    FOX News logo
    Rolling Stone logo
    Associated Press logo
    67 articles
  • 18d
    TIME Magazine logo
    The Economist logo
    Al Jazeera logo
    57 articles
  • 18d
    Slate logo
    USA TODAY logo
    FOX News logo
    56 articles
  • 18d
    The Guardian logo
    Reason logo
    New York Magazine logo
    51 articles
  • 18d
    The Guardian logo
    Western Journal logo
    Boston Globe logo
    43 articles
  • 18d
    PBS NewsHour logo
    The Intercept logo
    CNN logo
    33 articles
  • 19d
    Rolling Stone logo
    Reason logo
    CNN logo
    21 articles