Supreme Court Allows Terror Attack Victims to Sue Palestinian Authorities in U.S. Courts
The Supreme Court has ruled that victims of terror attacks are permitted to sue Palestinian authorities in U.S. courts, expanding legal avenues for justice.
Overview
- The U.S. Supreme Court has made a significant ruling regarding victims of terror attacks.
- Victims can now bring lawsuits against Palestinian authorities in U.S. courts.
- This decision opens new legal avenues for those affected by terrorism.
- The ruling is expected to have implications for international law and relations.
- The case highlights ongoing issues surrounding accountability for terrorist actions.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.
Get both sides in 5 minutes with our daily newsletter.
Analysis
Analysis unavailable for this viewpoint.
Articles (3)
Center (0)
No articles found in the Center category
FAQ
The lawsuits are allowed under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) of 1992 and the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act (PSJVTA). These laws permit personal jurisdiction over the Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organization, especially in cases where they are alleged to have paid salaries to terrorists or engaged in actions on U.S. soil, which Congress has condemned as incentivizing terrorism.
The ruling opens new legal avenues for victims of terrorism to seek justice in U.S. courts, which could complicate diplomatic relations and international legal standards concerning sovereignty and accountability for terrorist actions attributed to Palestinian authorities.
The lawsuits stem from terror attacks in the early 2000s that killed 33 people and injured hundreds, including a 2018 stabbing of a U.S.-born settler in the West Bank. Victims and families allege Palestinian agents were involved or incited these attacks. Earlier court rulings had dismissed the cases, but Congress amended the law to ensure victims could bring these lawsuits in U.S. courts.
The $218 million damages awarded by a jury for six terrorist attacks were tripled under the Anti-Terrorism Act, resulting in a $654 million verdict. This monetary award underscores the legal and financial consequences faced by the Palestinian authorities in these cases and illustrates the high stakes involved in terrorism-related litigation in U.S. courts.
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.