Supreme Court Limits Nationwide Injunctions, Leaves Birthright Citizenship Executive Order Unresolved
The Supreme Court's recent ruling restricts nationwide injunctions, impacting Trump's birthright citizenship executive order, but does not address its constitutionality.
CA leaders slam nationwide injunction ruling, vow to keep fighting
Washington Examiner
SCOTUS limits lower court blocks on Trump citizenship order
World News Group
Overview
- The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to limit judges' ability to issue nationwide injunctions, affecting federal actions.
- Justice Amy Coney Barrett authored the majority opinion, highlighting the need to prevent judicial overreach by lower courts.
- The Court did not rule on the constitutionality of Trump's birthright citizenship executive order, leaving it unresolved for now.
- Challengers are exploring new legal options, with Maryland lawyers filing an amended complaint for class-wide relief against the executive order.
- Trump aims to use the ruling to further his birthright citizenship proposal and other policies amidst ongoing legal challenges.
Content generated by AI—learn more or report issue.
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources frame the birthright citizenship debate as a significant legal and political struggle, emphasizing the tension between immigrant rights advocates and the Trump administration. They express concern over the implications of the Supreme Court's rulings, suggesting a bias towards protecting established rights while critiquing executive overreach.
"The decision could lead to a radical reshaping of a legal right to citizenship that's been long guaranteed by the 14th Amendment -- at least in the short term."
"The Supreme Court did not rule on the birthright issue itself."
"The Supreme Court’s ruling leaves open the possibility that groups challenging the policy could still get nationwide relief through class-action lawsuits and seek certification as a nationwide class."
Associated Press"The Supreme Court's ruling limiting the ability of judges to block President Donald Trump’s plan to end birthright citizenship has sparked new legal claims seeking similar results through different means."
"The ruling presents a threat to birthright citizenship, leaving some children stateless and risking deportation even when their parents are in the country legally."
"The Supreme Court’s decision did not remotely suggest otherwise."
"The possibility that Trump could end the right granted by the 14th Amendment has raised alarm among groups that had hoped the Supreme Court would outright block his initiative."
"The Supreme Court term has given the Trump administration a series of major wins in the final blockbuster week of its term."
"The Trump administration scored a notable legal victory today when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that federal district judges "likely exceed" their authority when they issue nationwide injunctions that entirely block federal laws or presidential orders from going into effect while legal challenges play out in court."
"The Supreme Court on Friday handed a significant victory to Donald Trump - and future American presidents - when curbing lower courts' power to block executive orders."
"SCOTUS has empowered the president to impose whatever he likes—irrespective of its constitutionality—and then prevented judicial overview except at the localized level."
The Bulwark"President Trump praised the Supreme Court for its decision Friday limiting the ability of federal judges to impose nationwide injunctions, calling it a "monumental victory for the Constitution.""
"President Donald Trump took a victory lap on Friday after the Supreme Court limited nationwide injunctions issued by lower court judges against his executive order to effectively end birthright citizenship."
"This decision is a smart balance between allowing a president leeway to enact his agenda while preserving the judiciary's important role to check executive power."
"The Supreme Court on Friday limited the use of nationwide injunctions, reining in federal judges' ability to issue sweeping orders that have in recent years stymied implementation of policies from Republican and Democratic presidential administrations alike."
"The executive order reflects the growing hostility toward all immigrants, regardless of how they arrived."
"The outcome was a victory for the Republican president, who has complained about individual judges throwing up obstacles to his agenda."
"The matter will return to lower courts, for now."
"The Court has put the kibosh on the growing practice of issuing universal injunctions."
"The Supreme Court's decision represents a temporary victory for President Donald Trump, making it harder to block new policies."
"The Supreme Court's decision asked the lower courts to reconsider their broad rulings in light of the Supreme Court's opinion and otherwise 'with principles of equity.'"
"The outcome was a victory for the Republican president, who has complained about individual judges throwing up obstacles to his agenda."
"The Supreme Court on Friday handed a major win to the Trump administration by allowing it to take steps to implement its proposal to end automatic birthright citizenship."
"The Supreme Court is meeting Friday to decide the final six cases of its term, including President Donald Trump’s bid to enforce his executive order denying birthright citizenship to U.S.-born children of parents who are in the country illegally."
Chicago Tribune"The final day of the Supreme Court term is going to be a big one."
"The case before the Supreme Court doesn’t focus on the lawfulness of the proposal itself, but rather on whether federal judges have the power to block it nationwide while litigation continues."
"The Supreme Court is expected to decide one of the most consequential cases in modern US history on Friday - whether a single federal judge can block an order from the US president from taking effect nationwide."
Articles (68)
FAQ
Nationwide injunctions are court orders that block the enforcement of federal policies across the entire country. The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to limit their use because they often exceed the authority Congress has given to federal courts, potentially leading to judicial overreach by lower courts.
The ruling allows the Trump administration to partially enforce the birthright citizenship executive order while legal proceedings continue, but only to the extent that previous injunctions were broader than necessary. The Court did not decide on the constitutionality of the order itself, leaving that unresolved.
Justice Barrett emphasized that federal courts do not have general oversight of the executive branch but resolve specific cases consistent with congressional authority. She argued that when courts find executive actions unlawful, they should not exceed their power by issuing universal injunctions.
Challengers are exploring new legal avenues, including filing amended complaints for class-wide relief against the birthright citizenship executive order, aiming to address the issue through class action procedures which the Court indicated as a proper route for broad relief.
No, the ruling does not completely eliminate nationwide injunctions. The Supreme Court indicated that judges can grant relief similar to nationwide injunctions in certain cases, such as when a state sues the federal government and proper procedural requirements are met.
History
- 19d
9 articles
- 20d
14 articles
- 20d
38 articles - 20d4 articles