Supreme Court Ruling Leads to Controversial Deportations to South Sudan
The Supreme Court's decision enables deportations to South Sudan, resulting in the removal of eight men with violent criminal backgrounds amid safety concerns.
Subscribe to unlock this story
We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!
Get StartedHave an account? Sign in
Overview
- The Supreme Court upheld the Trump administration's authority to deport migrants, including eight men to South Sudan, despite ongoing legal challenges.
- Eight men, convicted of violent crimes, were deported after being held at a U.S. military base in Djibouti during legal proceedings.
- The deportations have raised safety concerns due to South Sudan's ongoing civil war and lack of ties for the deportees.
- The State Department advises against travel to South Sudan, highlighting security threats and armed conflict in the region.
- Despite lower court injunctions, the Supreme Court's ruling allows the administration to proceed with deportations, igniting legal controversy.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources frame the deportation of the eight men as a contentious legal battle, highlighting judicial interventions and the complexities of due process. They express concern over the administration's actions, emphasizing the need for fair legal proceedings while acknowledging the men's criminal backgrounds, reflecting a nuanced perspective on immigration enforcement.
"The immigrants from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Vietnam and South Sudan arrived in South Sudan on Friday after a federal judge cleared the way for the Trump administration to relocate them in a case that had gone to the Supreme Court, which had permitted their removal from the U.S."
Associated Press"Judge Moss echoed the plaintiffs' lawyers concerns that the men could face torture and be harmed if they were deported to South Sudan."
ABC News"A federal judge on Friday temporarily halted deportations of eight immigrants to war-torn South Sudan the day after the Supreme Court greenlighted their removal, saying new claims by the immigrants' lawyers deserved a hearing."
ABC News"The decision is another win for the Trump administration and its unprecedented effort to deport immigrants to countries with which they have no ties and where they may face mistreatment."
ABC News"The Supreme Court's original order last month was a significant legal victory for President Trump and his mass deportation campaign."
CBS News"The Supreme Court's decision "rewards the government" for violating the judge's order, endangering "the life and safety of eight men who are now subject to imminent deportation to war-torn South Sudan.""
NBC News"The court’s majority had not explained their June 23 decision, as is common when acting on an emergency request."
USA TODAY"The decision comes after the court’s conservative majority found that immigration officials can quickly deport people to third countries."
Associated PressArticles (22)
Center (8)
FAQ
The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to proceed with deportations of migrants to South Sudan, lifting lower court injunctions that had required additional due process before such removals.
Eight men convicted of violent crimes were deported to South Sudan. The deportations are controversial due to concerns about their safety given South Sudan's ongoing civil war, lack of ties to the country, and warnings from the U.S. State Department against travel to South Sudan.
Lower court rulings required the government to provide due process and ensure deportees were not sent to countries where they might face torture, but the Supreme Court's ruling paused those requirements, allowing the deportations to proceed.
The Trump administration stated in court filings that South Sudanese officials assured that the deportees would not face torture upon their return, although critics remain concerned about their safety.
Critics, including some Supreme Court justices in dissent, have called the deportations "punitive and unconstitutional," arguing that the deportees were denied due process and sent to a dangerous country despite safety concerns.
History
- 2M
5 articles
- 2M
5 articles
- 2M9 articles