Left-leaning sources frame the Trump administration's EPA proposal as a dangerous rollback of climate protections, emphasizing its potential to dismantle federal climate action. They highlight the unusual process, link it to a broader conservative agenda, and feature critical voices from environmental groups and former officials to underscore its perceived legal flaws and detachment from scientific reality.

"The EPA appears to be making a legal argument in the draft that the agency went beyond its legal authority to use the Clean Air Act to regulate pollutants that contribute to climate change, rather than trying to make a scientific argument that climate change itself isn’t harming humans, sources told CNN."

CNN

·3M

Article

right-leaning sources frame the Trump administration's reported plan to rescind the EPA's Endangerment Finding as a necessary correction to an "overreaching climate agenda." They emphasize the "harsh regulations" and "trillions of dollars of costs" imposed, portraying the rollback as a positive step to "strengthen the U.S. electricity grid" and protect "consumer choice" from perceived government overreach.

"If the agency undoes the Endangerment Finding, stringent emissions rules on power plants and vehicles could be rolled back, which would position the administration to strengthen the U.S. electricity grid and protect consumer choice, experts have explained to the DCNF previously."

Daily Caller

·3M

Article