President Trump's Tariffs Face Intensifying Legal Challenges in Federal Courts
President Trump's extensive tariffs, implemented since April, are facing significant legal challenges in federal courts, with lawsuits arguing he exceeded executive authority, potentially heading to the Supreme Court.
Overview
- President Trump implemented extensive tariffs, including a 10% baseline, across various trading partners starting in April, impacting international trade relations.
- These tariffs are now facing significant legal challenges in federal courts, with at least seven lawsuits arguing President Trump exceeded his executive authority.
- The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled against Trump's tariffs in May, and the U.S. Court of Appeals is currently reviewing their legality.
- Plaintiffs contend the U.S. Constitution grants Congress sole power to levy taxes, challenging Trump's use of emergency power laws for tariff imposition without congressional approval.
- The legal battle is widely expected to reach the U.S. Supreme Court, regardless of the appeals court's decision, creating uncertainty for the future of Trump's trade policies.
Report issue
Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources frame this story by emphasizing the negative economic consequences and legal challenges of the Trump administration's tariff policies. They consistently highlight expert opinions and data suggesting increased costs for consumers, market uncertainty, and a lack of evidence for stated benefits, while also underscoring the unprecedented nature and legal vulnerability of the president's actions.
"The change — while potentially welcome news to countries that had not yet reached a deal with the U.S. — injected a new dose of uncertainty for consumers and businesses still wondering what’s going to happen and when."
Associated Press"Amid concerns that the White House's trade agenda was fueling economic uncertainty for businesses and consumers, Trump administration officials this spring pledged to nail down "90 deals in 90 days.""
CBS News"With the newly signed tariffs not taking effect right away, uncertainty is likely to linger for consumers and businesses trying to plan for the rest of the year and beyond."
NBC News"Trump’s tariff agenda faced a stern test in federal court, with an appeals court taking a skeptical view of the administration’s argument for imposing tariffs."
NBC News"The arguments - one day before Trump plans to increase tariff rates on imported goods from nearly all U.S. trading partners - mark the first test before a U.S. appeals court of the scope of his tariff authority."
USA TODAY"The legal fights before the appeals court were brought by a group of 12 states and five small businesses, and their cases are a major test of the centerpiece of Mr. Trump's economic agenda."
CBS News"The lingering uncertainty that has kept consumers and businesses in a bind for the better part of this year could remain."
NBC News"But his radical overhaul of American trade policy, in which he's bypassed Congress to slam big tariffs on most of the world's economies, has not gone unchallenged."
ABC NewsArticles (21)
Center (8)
FAQ
The lawsuits argue that President Trump exceeded his executive authority by imposing tariffs without congressional approval, contending that only Congress has the sole power to levy taxes under the U.S. Constitution.
The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled against the tariffs in May, and currently, a three-judge panel is reviewing their legality in the U.S. Court of Appeals, which has given the tariffs a frosty reception.
Because multiple lawsuits have challenged the president’s authority to impose tariffs without congressional approval, and given the constitutional questions involved, it is widely anticipated that the Supreme Court will ultimately decide on the issue regardless of the appeals court's decision.
The tariffs, including a baseline 10% tariff imposed across various trading partners, have created tensions in international trade relations by disrupting normal trade flows and provoking legal and political responses from affected countries.
President Trump relied on emergency power laws to impose the tariffs without seeking congressional approval, a justification that plaintiffs argue is inconsistent with constitutional limits on executive authority.
History
- 1M
4 articles
- 1M
3 articles
- 1M5 articles