What was the main content and conclusion of the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) regarding Russian interference?

The 2017 ICA concluded that Russia conducted a significant influence campaign in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, directed by President Vladimir Putin, aimed at undermining public faith in the U.S. democratic process, discrediting Secretary Clinton, and supporting President-elect Trump. The report was produced jointly by the CIA, NSA, and FBI and noted Russia's use of cyber espionage and covert influence operations.

What allegations were made about the process of producing the 2017 ICA?

Declassified emails revealed that former DNI James Clapper allegedly pressured staff to rush the 2017 ICA, compromising normal intelligence assessment procedures despite concerns from NSA Director Mike Rogers about the expedited process. This raised questions about the politicization and potential manufacturing of the intelligence assessment.

How did FBI and NSA officials reportedly view the confidence level of the ICA’s specific claims about Russian interference?

While the ICA as a whole concluded Russia interfered to support Trump and harm Clinton, parts of the FBI and NSA expressed low confidence in certain key claims, specifically regarding the leaked DNC and DCCC data and some intelligence sources, indicating some disagreement within agencies about the certainty of elements of the report.

What motivations did DNI Tulsi Gabbard cite for releasing the emails about the rushed ICA?

DNI Tulsi Gabbard released the emails to support her claim that the 2017 ICA was politically manufactured to create a predetermined narrative about Trump and Russia. She alleged the intelligence was falsified and used to undermine President Trump with the cooperation of media and political actors, starting a prolonged effort to delegitimize his presidency.

4 articles

·1M

Declassified Emails Reveal Allegations of Rushed 2017 Intelligence Assessment

Declassified emails reveal former DNI James Clapper allegedly rushed a politicized 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment on Russian election interference, despite concerns from NSA Director Mike Rogers.

r 100%

DNI Tulsi Gabbard reveals James Clapper sought to ‘compromise’ normal procedures to rush Russiagate hoax intelligence report

The Post Millennial

Subscribe to unlock this story

We really don't like cutting you off, but you've reached your monthly limit. At just $5/month, subscriptions are how we keep this project going. Start your free 7-day trial today!

Get Started

Have an account? Sign in

Overview

A summary of the key points of this story verified across multiple sources.

Newly declassified emails reveal former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper allegedly directed officials to expedite a 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA).
This alleged directive involved compromising normal procedures to rush the assessment, which focused on Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election.
NSA Director Mike Rogers reportedly expressed concerns about the rushed intelligence review processes, indicating pressure to expedite the assessment despite procedural worries.
The 2017 ICA concluded Russia interfered to help Trump win and leaked DNC/DCCC data, but faced low confidence assessments from the FBI and NSA regarding these specific claims.
DNI Tulsi Gabbard released these emails, reinforcing her belief that the ICA was politically manufactured to support a predetermined narrative about Trump and Russia.

Written by AI using shared reports from

4 articles

Report issue

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day

Analysis

Compare how each side frames the story — including which facts they emphasize or leave out.

Analysis unavailable for this viewpoint.

How we categorize media bias

Articles (4)

Compare how different news outlets are covering this story.

Sort By

Center (0)

No articles found in the Center category

FAQ

Dig deeper on this story with frequently asked questions.

: The 2017 ICA concluded that Russia conducted a significant influence campaign in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, directed by President Vladimir Putin, aimed at undermining public faith in the U.S. democratic process, discrediting Secretary Clinton, and supporting President-elect Trump. The report was produced jointly by the CIA, NSA, and FBI and noted Russia's use of cyber espionage and covert influence operations.
Senate Intelligence Committee Report on the 2017 ICA
: Declassified emails revealed that former DNI James Clapper allegedly pressured staff to rush the 2017 ICA, compromising normal intelligence assessment procedures despite concerns from NSA Director Mike Rogers about the expedited process. This raised questions about the politicization and potential manufacturing of the intelligence assessment.
Office of the Director of National Intelligence Press Release, 2025
: While the ICA as a whole concluded Russia interfered to support Trump and harm Clinton, parts of the FBI and NSA expressed low confidence in certain key claims, specifically regarding the leaked DNC and DCCC data and some intelligence sources, indicating some disagreement within agencies about the certainty of elements of the report.
Senate Intelligence Committee Report on the 2017 ICA
: DNI Tulsi Gabbard released the emails to support her claim that the 2017 ICA was politically manufactured to create a predetermined narrative about Trump and Russia. She alleged the intelligence was falsified and used to undermine President Trump with the cooperation of media and political actors, starting a prolonged effort to delegitimize his presidency.
Office of the Director of National Intelligence Press Release, 2025

History

See how this story has evolved over time.

This story does not have any previous versions.