


Lawsuits Challenge Texas Redistricting Maps Over Allegations of Racial Bias
Voting-rights advocates and civil rights groups have filed lawsuits against Texas Republicans, alleging that newly approved redistricting maps are racially biased and weaken Black voters' electoral influence for the 2026 election.
Overview
- Voting-rights advocates, civil rights groups, and the NAACP have filed lawsuits against Texas Republicans over racially biased redistricting maps.
- The lawsuits claim Texas lawmakers approved a map adding five new districts favoring Republicans, leading to voter disenfranchisement and increased Republican representation.
- Accusations of racially biased gerrymandering aim to prevent Black voters from electing candidates of their choice, as stated by advocates in the legal challenges.
- The lawsuits highlight that white voters, comprising 40% of the population, control over 73% of Texas's congressional seats, indicating significant racial bias.
- Democratic state legislators, a minority in both chambers, express concerns about fair representation for Black and Brown voters under the new election maps.
Report issue

Read both sides in 5 minutes each day
Analysis
Center-leaning sources frame this story by prioritizing the voting-rights advocates' claims of racial bias and the map's alleged impact on Black voters. They emphasize the NAACP's accusations of gerrymandering and unconstitutionality through prominent placement of their statements, while presenting the Republican defense and legal context as counterpoints. The narrative structure consistently highlights the advocates' perspective, giving them the initial and concluding emphasis.
Articles (4)
Center (2)
FAQ
The lawsuits allege that the Texas redistricting maps violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the 14th Amendment by diluting Black and Latino voters' electoral power, intentionally dismantling majority-minority districts, and constituting racial gerrymandering aimed at reducing minority representation.
The new maps add five congressional districts favoring Republicans, increasing their safe seats, while weakening Black and Latino voters' ability to elect candidates of their choice by dismantling majority-minority districts, leading to disproportionate control of seats by white voters.
The DOJ sent a letter warning that several districts in Texas's 2021 maps were unconstitutional racial gerrymanders under the Voting Rights Act, threatening legal action, which led Governor Abbott to order a mid-decade redistricting to create new maps favoring Republicans but facing lawsuits for voter dilution.
Redistricting traditionally occurs once per decade after new census data; Texas’s mid-decade redistricting, using the same 2020 census data, is challenged as unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause because it was done voluntarily mid-cycle, purportedly for partisan gain, without new population data.
Democratic legislators, a minority in Texas, have protested the maps, accusing Republicans of racially motivated gerrymandering, walked out to delay the vote, and filed lawsuits arguing the maps violate the Voting Rights Act by diluting minority votes and undermining fair representation.
History
- This story does not have any previous versions.